Willie E. Brazier, Petitioner,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 17, 2008
0320080044 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 17, 2008)

0320080044

04-17-2008

Willie E. Brazier, Petitioner, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Willie E. Brazier,

Petitioner,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Petition No. 0320080044

MSPB No. DA0752070352I1

DECISION

On March 19, 2008, petitioner filed a timely petition with the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission asking for review of a Final Order

issued by the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) concerning his claim

of discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Petitioner alleged that he was discriminated against on the bases of

race (African-American), sex (male), and reprisal for prior protected

EEO activity under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when he was

removed from his position of Mail Processing Clerk, effective October 27,

2006. The record indicates that petitioner was removed for being absent

without leave (AWOL) from Friday July 14, 2006 through Monday, August 14,

2006. Petitioner failed to respond to several requests for information

from the agency. Moreover, the record indicates that petitioner failed

to appear for an Investigative Interview regarding his absences.

A hearing was held and thereafter an MSPB Administrative Judge (AJ)

issued an initial decision finding no discrimination or reprisal.

The AJ upheld the charges against petitioner and found the penalty of

removal was reasonable. The AJ noted that petitioner failed to support

his allegations of discrimination or reprisal. Petitioner sought review

by the full Board which denied his request. Petitioner then filed the

instant petition, raising many of the same arguments that he made before

the Board.

EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission has jurisdiction over

mixed case appeals on which the MSPB has issued a decision that makes

determinations on allegations of discrimination. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.303

et seq. The Commission must determine whether the decision of the

MSPB with respect to the allegation of discrimination constitutes a

correct interpretation of any applicable law, rule, regulation or policy

directive, and is supported by the evidence in the record as a whole.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.305(c).

Based upon a thorough review of the record, it is the decision of

the Commission to concur with the final decision of the MSPB finding

no discrimination. The Commission finds that the MSPB's decision

constitutes a correct interpretation of the laws, rules, regulations,

and policies governing this matter and is supported by the evidence in

the record as a whole.

PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (W0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court,

based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date that you receive this decision.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

April 17, 2008

__________________

Date

2

0320080044

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

2

0320080044