Vincent J. Duncan, Complainant,v.Glenn L. McCullough, Jr., Chairman, Tennessee Valley Authority, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 5, 2003
01A30608 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 5, 2003)

01A30608

03-05-2003

Vincent J. Duncan, Complainant, v. Glenn L. McCullough, Jr., Chairman, Tennessee Valley Authority, Agency.


Vincent J. Duncan v. Tennessee Valley Authority

01A30608

March 5, 2003

.

Vincent J. Duncan,

Complainant,

v.

Glenn L. McCullough, Jr.,

Chairman,

Tennessee Valley Authority,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A30608

Agency No. 0814-2002052

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from an agency

final decision pertaining to her complaint of unlawful employment

discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. The Commission

accepts the appeal in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405.

On July 16, 2002, complainant contacted the EEO office claiming that he

was discriminated against when: in December 2001, he was not selected

for a Manager, Plant Production (Methods) position announced under

Vacancy No. 017671. Informal efforts to resolve complainant's concerns

were unsuccessful. Subsequently, complainant filed a formal complaint

based on race.

On October 11, 2002, the agency issued a decision dismissing the complaint

on the grounds of untimely counselor contact. The agency reasoned that

although complainant knew that his application was received in December

2001, he did not contact the EEO office within forty-five days. Further,

the agency noted that �when [complainant was] not interviewed for the

position [he] should have realized at some time far sooner than July

4, 2002 that [he was] not being considered or selected.� Finding that

complainant waited approximately six months after the selection process

to contact the EEO Counselor, the agency dismissed the complaint pursuant

to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2).

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of

discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal Employment

Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the date of the

matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel

action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action.

The Commission has adopted a "reasonable suspicion" standard (as opposed

to a "supportive facts" standard) to determine when the forty-five (45)

day limitation period is triggered. See Howard v. Department of the Navy,

EEOC Request No. 05970852 (February 11, 1999). Thus, the time limitation

is not triggered until a complainant reasonably suspects discrimination,

but before all the facts that support a charge of discrimination have

become apparent.

EEOC Regulations provide that the agency or the Commission shall extend

the time limits when the individual shows that he was not notified of the

time limits and was not otherwise aware of them, that he did not know

and reasonably should not have known that the discriminatory matter or

personnel action occurred, that despite due diligence he was prevented

by circumstances beyond his control from contacting the Counselor within

the time limits, or for other reasons considered sufficient by the agency

or the Commission.

In the instant case, complainant argues that after submitting his

application, and receiving confirmation that it was received, he was

never contacted by the agency. Consequently, complainant states, �I

was under the impression that the screening process was not finished.�

According to complainant, it was not until the weekend of July 4, 2002,

while talking with relatives that also worked for the agency, that he

learned that the position had been filled. With respect to the agency's

contention that complainant should have checked on the position sooner,

complainant argues that the agency �can take upwards of a 120 days to make

a selection. . . .� He states that, based on his previous experience with

vacancy announcements, he had no reason to believe he needed to contact

the Human Resources Officer about the position. The Commission agrees,

and finds that complainant did not reasonably suspect discrimination

until he learned in July 2002, that the position had been filled.

Therefore, we find that there is sufficient justification for extending

the forty-five-day time limitation.

Accordingly, the agency's decision to dismiss the complaint was improper

and is hereby REVERSED. The complaint is REMANDED to the agency for

further processing in accordance with this decision and the Order below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the

applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or

opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 5, 2003

__________________

Date