Victor Szluzer, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 8, 2007
0120072600 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 8, 2007)

0120072600

08-08-2007

Victor Szluzer, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Victor Szluzer,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120072600

Agency No. 4C-430-0052-07

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated May 1, 2007, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure

to state a claim.

In a complaint dated April 27, 2007, complainant alleged that he was

subjected to discrimination on the basis of reprisal for prior protected

EEO activity when, on March 15, 2007, management imposed a daily two

(2) hour cap on complainant's time for representing others.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.605(b) provides that if a complainant

in the EEO process is an employee of the agency, and designates

another agency employee as his or her representative, then the agency

will give the complainant's representative a reasonable amount of

official time to prepare the complaint and respond to agency and

EEOC requests for information. The Commission has also stated that

an allegation pertaining to the denial of official time states a

separately-processable claim alleging a violation of the Commission's

regulations, without requiring a determination of whether the action

was motivated by discrimination. See Edwards v. U.S. Postal Service,

EEOC Request No. 05960179 (December 23, 1996). The Commission has held

that it has the authority to remedy a violation of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.605

without a finding of discrimination. Id. The Commission held that such

a claim should not be processed in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108,

since the focus is not on the motivation, but rather the justification of

why the complainant was denied a reasonable amount of official time. Id.

However, the complaint at issue has been properly dismissed because

it was filed by a representative claiming reprisal discrimination when

he was denied official time to represent other individuals in the EEO

process. The Commission has held that the right to official time for

a representative flows from the complainant s/he is representing, and

therefore, a denial of official time for a representative is properly

raised by that complainant, and not the representative. See Lambert

v. Social Security Administration, EEOC Request No. 05970586 (October 8,

1998). For this reason, complainant in the instant matter does not have

standing to raise the issue of being denied official time when serving

as an EEO representative for other individuals.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision to dismiss the complaint is

AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 8, 2007

__________________

Date

2

0120072600

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

4

0120072600