Vicki Jefferies, et al., Complainant,v.John W. Snow, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 10, 2004
05A30922 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 10, 2004)

05A30922

02-10-2004

Vicki Jefferies, et al., Complainant, v. John W. Snow, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.


Vicki Jefferies, et al. v. Department of the Treasury

05A30922

February 10, 2004

.

Vicki Jefferies, et al.,

Complainant,

v.

John W. Snow,

Secretary,

Department of the Treasury,

Agency.

Request No. 05A30922

Appeal No. 01A02227

Agency No. 98-0007C

Hearing No. 100-98-7812X

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

The Department of the Treasury (agency) timely initiated a request to the

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider

the decision in Vicki Jefferies, et al. v. Department of the Treasury,

EEOC Appeal No. 01A02227 (April 15, 2003). EEOC Regulations provide that

the Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission

decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate

decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact

or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on

the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. �

1614.405(b).

After a review of the agency's request for reconsideration, the previous

decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request

fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is

the decision of the Commission to deny the request.<1> The decision

in EEOC Appeal No. 01A02227 remains the Commission's final decision.

There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of

the Commission on this request for reconsideration.

ORDER

The agency shall continue processing the remanded class complaint

in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.204(e), et seq. Within fifteen

(15) days of the date this decision becomes final, the agency shall

notify all class members of the acceptance of the class complaint as

required by � 1614.204(e). Within fifteen (15) days of the date this

decision becomes final, the agency shall request that the Hearings Unit

of the appropriate EEOC District Office continue processing the matter

pursuant to � 1614.204(f), et seq., and schedule a hearing pursuant to

� 1614.204(h). The agency is directed to submit a copy of the complaint

file to the EEOC District Office within fifteen (15) days of the date this

decision becomes final. The agency shall provide written notification

to the Compliance Officer at the address set forth herein that the class

members have been notified of the acceptance of the class complaint and

that the complaint file has been submitted to the EEOC District Office.

After receiving a recommended decision from the Administrative Judge,

the agency shall issue a decision in accordance with � 1614.204(j).

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this

decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

February 10, 2004

__________________

Date

1 The agency argued on RTR that Elzy and

Hawkins-Jones were supervisors during the relevant time. The previous

decision found that the claim of a supervisor is not typical of the

claims of the class as a whole. Therefore, clearly those individuals

should be excluded from the class. The exclusion of these employees

does not affect the previous decision's certification of the class.