Verne Hall, Appellant,v.John H. Dalton, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 13, 1998
01973975 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 13, 1998)

01973975

11-13-1998

Verne Hall, Appellant, v. John H. Dalton, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.


Verne Hall v. Department of the Navy

01973975

November 13, 1998

Verne Hall, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01973975

) Agency No. (MC)97-670001-N08

John H. Dalton, )

Secretary, )

Department of the Navy, )

Agency. )

_______________________________________)

DECISION

INTRODUCTION

Appellant timely initiated an appeal to the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (EEOC) from the final agency decision concerning her equal

employment opportunity (EEO) complaint, which alleged discrimination in

violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42

U.S.C. �2000e et seq., and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �791 et seq. The appeal is accepted by the Commission in

accordance with the provisions of EEOC Order No. 960.001.

ISSUE PRESENTED

The issue presented is whether the agency properly dismissed the various

allegations of appellant's complaint.

BACKGROUND

In a complaint dated March 3, 1997, appellant, then a former Accounting

Technician, NF-0525-02, alleged that the agency discriminated against

her as follows: (a) on the basis of race, sex, mental disability,

and reprisal when she was harassed on an ongoing and continuing basis

by supervisors and coworkers; and (b) on the same bases when she was

harassed, in that she was forced to resign. By final agency decision

(FAD) dated April 8, 1997, the agency dismissed allegation (a) on the

ground that the specific incidents identified by appellant had been

raised in a total of six previous complaints pending resolution; and

dismissed allegation (b) for failure to state a claim, noting that the

factual circumstances alleged by appellant did not rise to the level

of harassment. It is from this decision that appellant now appeals.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The Commission's regulations provide that an agency shall dismiss

a complaint or portion of a complaint that states the same claim as

another complaint pending before, or already decided by, the agency or

the Commission. 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a). In this case, however, the

agency has not submitted evidence (such as copies of appellant's previous

complaints) that the complaint on appeal in fact alleges the identical

incidents alleged by appellant in previous complaints. Accordingly,

the dismissal of allegation (a) must be reversed.

With regard to allegation (b), appellant alleged that her attorney

relayed to her the comment of an agency official that if appellant

did not change her conduct she could be removed from employment, and

that appellant therefore felt that she had no choice but to resign.

The Commission notes that the facts alleged by appellant do not state

a claim of harassment. See Cobb v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC

Request No.05970077 (March 13, 1997).

The Commission further notes, however, that allegation (b) did not allege

harassment per se, but rather alleged constructive discharge on account

of discriminatory harassment. The agency's dismissal of allegation (b)

on the grounds that the underlying conduct complained of by appellant

did not constitute harassment goes to the merits of the constructive

discharge allegation. The agency dismissed the constructive discharge

allegation for putatively procedural reasons while looking to the merits

of the allegation. Accordingly, the dismissal of allegation (b) must

be reversed.

CONCLUSION

Based upon a thorough review of the record, and for the foregoing reasons,

it is the decision of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to

REVERSE the final agency decision and REMAND the complaint for further

processing.

ORDER (E1092)

The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded allegations in accordance

with 29 C.F.R. �1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to appellant

that it has received the remanded allegations within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue to

appellant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify appellant

of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days

of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise

resolved prior to that time. If appellant requests a final decision

without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within sixty

(60) days of receipt of appellant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to appellant and a copy

of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights

must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order,

appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order.

29 C.F.R. �1614.503 (a). Appellant also has the right to file a civil

action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or

following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. ��

1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503 (g). Alternatively, appellant has the

right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance

with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File a Civil Action."

29 C.F.R. ��1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for enforcement or a

civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated

in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If appellant files a civil

action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any

petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �l6l4.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such an action in an appropriate

United States District Court. It is the position of the Commission

that you have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United

States District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date

that you receive this decision. You should be aware, however, that

courts in some jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of

1991 in a manner suggesting that a civil action must be filed WITHIN

THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

To ensure that your civil action is considered timely, you are advised to

file it WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive

this decision or to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time

period in the jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. In the

alternative, you may file a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY (180)

CALENDARS DAYS of the date you filed your complaint with the agency,

or filed your appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action,

YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE

OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY

HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result

in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department"

means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or

department in which you work. Filing a civil action will terminate the

administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your

time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

Nov. 13, 1998

DATE Ronnie Blumenthal, Director

Office of Federal Operations