Timothy L. Stoinhoff, Appellant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 5, 1998
01976668 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 5, 1998)

01976668

11-05-1998

Timothy L. Stoinhoff, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Timothy L. Stoinhoff v. United States Postal Service

01976668

November 5, 1998

Timothy L. Stoinhoff, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01976668

) Agency No. 4-H-320-1286-96

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

___________________________________)

DISMISSAL

Appellant filed the instant appeal in an envelope postmarked September

8, 1997. On the appeal form (EEOC Form 573) appellant stated that he

was appealing a decision received by appellant on September 4, 1997

in agency number 4H-320-1116-96. The date next to the signature line

on the instant appeal form is September 7, 1997. Enclosed with the

instant appeal is a memorandum from appellant to the agency's EEO Office

(Appeals Processing Center) in Memphis, Tennessee. Also enclosed with the

instant appeal is the agency's decision dated August 28, 1997 dismissing

a portion of 4-H-320-1274-96.

By letter dated September 25, 1997 appellant informed the Commission:

On September 7, I mistakenly sent your office an appeals packet intended

only for the Memphis Appeals Center. Also in reviewing the information

I inadvertently substituted the wrong case number for the appeal.

The correct case number should be as follows (4h-320-1286-96).

Please disregard this information. I would also [appreciate] this packet

returned to me.

In an envelope postmarked September 26, 1997 appellant sent a second

appeal to the Commission. On this appeal form (EEOC Form 573) appellant

stated that he was appealing a decision received by appellant on September

4, 1997 in agency number 4H-320-1286-96. The date next to the signature

line on this appeal form is September 7, 1997. The Commission assigned

EEOC Appeal No. 01980095 to the appeal contained in the envelope

postmarked September 26, 1997. By letter dated June 26, 1998 the

Commission informed appellant that the Commission was closing the record

listed under EEOC Appeal No. 01980095 (agency number 4-H-320-1286-96)

because: "You are seeking an appeal of a pre-complaint you voluntarily

withdrew on 2/28/97."

The agency sent the Commission a final agency decision dated April 24,

1998 finding no discrimination in 4-H-320-1274-96. The April 24, 1998

decision specifically stated that it was deciding on the merits the

allegation which was procedurally dismissed on August 28, 1997.

The Commission finds that the instant appeal is, as explained by

appellant in his letter dated September 25, 1997, an appeal concerning

4-H-320-1286-96. Agency number 4-H-320-1286-96 was considered in EEOC

Appeal No. 01980095. Therefore, we find that the instant appeal must

be dismissed because it is a duplicate of EEOC Appeal No. 01980095.

In issuing such a dismissal we note: (1) Commission records do not show

that appellant has filed any appeal from, or expressed disagreement with,

the Commission's June 26, 1998 letter in EEOC Appeal No. 01980095; (2)

appellant has never claimed that he is filing an appeal from the agency's

procedural decision in 4-H-320-1274-96; and (3) appellant has not filed

an appeal from the agency's April 24, 1998 decision in 4-H-320-1274-96.

The instant appeal is DISMISSED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �l6l4.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil action,

YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE

OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS

OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in

the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

November 5, 1998

DATE Ronnie Blumenthal, Director

Office of Federal Operations