Tamara Y. Tidwell, Complainant,v.Dr. Rebecca Blank, Acting Secretary, Department of Commerce (Bureau of the Census), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 30, 2012
0520120257 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 30, 2012)

0520120257

11-30-2012

Tamara Y. Tidwell, Complainant, v. Dr. Rebecca Blank, Acting Secretary, Department of Commerce (Bureau of the Census), Agency.


Tamara Y. Tidwell,

Complainant,

v.

Dr. Rebecca Blank,

Acting Secretary,

Department of Commerce

(Bureau of the Census),

Agency.

Request No. 0520120257

Appeal No. 0120113889

Hearing No. 550-2011-00187X

Agency No. 10-63-02064D

DENIAL

Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in Tamara Y. Tidwell v. Department of Commerce, EEOC Appeal No. 0120113889 (Jan. 13, 2012). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

Our previous decision dismissed Complainant's appeal as untimely filed. The decision noted that Complainant received the Agency's May 23, 2011, final order on May 31, 2011, and filed her appeal on August 1, 2011, which was beyond the thirty (30) day time limit set by regulations. The decision held that Complainant failed to submit adequate justification to invoke waiver or equitable tolling for filing her appeal.

In her request for reconsideration, Complainant reiterates her assertion that the Agency discriminated against her when it terminated her employment. She does not address her failure to file her appeal in a timely manner. In response, the Agency argues that Complainant has not met the criteria for reconsideration.

We remind Complainant that a "request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission." Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110) (rev. Nov. 9, 1999), at 9-17; see, e.g., Lopez v. Dep't of Agriculture, EEOC Request No. 0520070736 (Aug. 20, 2007). Rather, a reconsideration request is an opportunity to demonstrate that the previous decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. Complainant has not done so here. She has not shown that she timely filed her appeal or offered any justification for an extension of the applicable time limit.

After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to DENY the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120113889 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and

the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

November 30, 2012

Date

2

0520120257

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0520120257