Stephania G. Johnson, Complainant,v.R. James Nicholson, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 30, 2007
0120065097 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 30, 2007)

0120065097

03-30-2007

Stephania G. Johnson, Complainant, v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Stephania G. Johnson,

Complainant,

v.

R. James Nicholson,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01200650971

Agency No. 200L05202006102

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated August 15, 2006, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and

Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act),

as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds

that complainant's complaint was improperly dismissed pursuant to 29

C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim. In her complaint,

complainant alleged that she was subjected to discrimination on the bases

of race (African-American) and disability when she was subjected to a

hostile work environment and when the agency failed to accommodate her

since June 2005.

The agency dismissed both claims, stating that the complaint was

a collateral attack on a grievance settlement. Information in the

record indicates that claims of discrimination can be brought up

in grievances. The record indicates that complainant entered into

a settlement agreement in June 2005 wherein she would be reassigned

and accommodated. The agency also cited to Jenkins v. USPS, Appeal

No. 01952972 (April 1, 1996) in arguing that "discrimination because of

an on-the job injury is not within the purview of the anti-discrimination

statutes."

As an initial matter, the Commission notes that the settlement agreement

was made in June 2005 and complainant is also alleging a hostile work

environment. To that extent, the matter is not addressed by the agreement

and an agreement cannot bar such prospective claims.

Further, the Commission finds that the agency's reliance on Jenkins

is misguided. Jenkins stated that retaliation for having an on-the-job

injury is not covered by statutes. It does NOT state that if a person

becomes disabled because of an on the job injury, that disability

(or retaliation for seeking accommodation) is not within the purview

of anti-discrimination statutes. Neither the Section 501 of the

Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. nor the

Americans with Disability Act distinguish as to how a person becomes

disabled, and it is those statutes which control.

Here complainant is arguing that the agency is not providing her with

reasonable accommodation and that she is being assigned work outside of

her limitations. The agency may not now point to the June 2005 settlement

agreement to avoid its responsibilities under the Rehabilitation Act.

As such, both her harassment claim and failure to accommodate claim are

distinct from the settlement agreement.

Complainant has shown an injury or harm to a term, condition, or privilege

of employment for which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Department of the

Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). Accordingly, the

agency's final decision dismissing complainant's complaint is reversed.

The complaint is hereby remanded to the agency for further processing

in accordance with this decision and the Order below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 30, 2007

__________________

Date

1 Due to a new Commission data system, this case has been redesignated

with the above-referenced appeal number.

??

??

??

??

2

0120065097

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

5

0120065097