Sherry Moran, Complainant,v.Rodney E. Slater, Secretary, Department of Transportation, (Federal Aviation Administration), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 9, 2000
01a02125 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 9, 2000)

01a02125

06-09-2000

Sherry Moran, Complainant, v. Rodney E. Slater, Secretary, Department of Transportation, (Federal Aviation Administration), Agency.


Sherry Moran, )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01A02125

) Agency No. DOT1001109

Rodney E. Slater, )

Secretary, )

Department of Transportation, )

(Federal Aviation Administration), )

Agency. )

____________________________________)

DECISION

The Commission finds that the agency decision dated December 21, 1999,

which dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim, is proper

pursuant to 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (to be codified and hereinafter

cited as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)).<1> In her formal EEO complaint,

complainant alleged that the agency discriminated against her in reprisal

for filing a complaint with the agency's Office of Inspector General

(OIG). In her complaint to the OIG, complainant challenged the safety

practices of the agency. The agency found that filing a complaint

with the OIG is not a protected activity and that complainant had not

participated in prior EEO activity.

According to EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.101(b), an agency cannot

retaliate against an employee who opposes any practice made unlawful by

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (Title VII) (42 USC 2000e et seq.),

the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) (29 USC 621 et seq.),

the Equal Pay Act (29 USC 206(d)), or the Rehabilitation Act (29 USC 791

et seq.) or for participating in any stage of administrative or judicial

proceedings under those statutes. When a complaint of reprisal fails

to identify any EEO or other protected activity, the complaint is not

within the purview of Title VII and must be dismissed for failure to

state a claim. Bryant v. Department of Justice, EEOC Request No. 05980273

(June 4, 1999).

In this case, the alleged retaliation occurred after complainant

participated in the agency's administrative process, not the EEO

process. According to complainant's letter on appeal, her OIG complaint

did not allege that the agency violated the statutes which the Commission

administers. The OIG complaint only alleged that the agency violated

safety policies. Therefore, filing the OIG complaint was not protected

activity, and the present EEO complaint must be dismissed.

The agency's decision is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0300)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF

RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred

to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must

also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0400)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS

THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

June 9, 2000

____________________________

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

_______________ __________________________

Date 1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's

federal sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations

apply to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in

the administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply

the revised regulations found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where

applicable, in deciding the present appeal. The regulations, as amended,

may also be found at the Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.