Sandra P. Taylor, Complainant,v.Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 22, 2002
01A15255 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 22, 2002)

01A15255

10-22-2002

Sandra P. Taylor, Complainant, v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.


Sandra P. Taylor v. Social Security Administration

01A15255

October 22, 2002

.

Sandra P. Taylor,

Complainant,

v.

Jo Anne B. Barnhart,

Commissioner,

Social Security Administration,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A15255

Agency Nos. 00-0420-SSA and 00-0421-SSA

DISMISSAL OF APPEAL

Complainant filed an appeal with this Commission from the August 11,

2001 final agency decisions finding no discrimination with regard to

her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42

U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973

(Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq., and the Age

Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. �

621 et seq. In complaint number 00-0420-SSA complainant alleged that

she was subjected to discrimination on the bases of race (Caucasian),

disability (asthma), and age (53 at the relevant time) when she was

subjected to harassment (non-sexual) as follows:

The Area Director issued complainant a memorandum, dated February 7,

2000, entitled Results of Review of Colorado Springs District Office,

regarding employee complaints about the manner in which the office

was being managed. On December 22, 1999, and January 13, 2000, Area

Director investigated complainant and her management team, which resulted

in the memorandum dated February 7, 2000. The memorandum also stated

that complainant would need to discard her �old management style.�

Management has allowed the union to harass complainant, i.e., by

filing frivolous Unfair Labor Practice charges; and the local union

representative has been allowed to speak to complainant in a demeaning

manner.

Senior management has not provided the necessary resources to implement

the management changes they have mandated in the February 7 memorandum.

Complainant was not offered the same career counseling from senior

management as her Hispanic peers.

In complaint number 00-0421-SSA complainant alleged that she was

subjected to discrimination on the bases of race, disability, age,

and reprisal for prior EEO activity when:

Complainant did not receive a performance award for fiscal year 1999; and

Complainant was treated disparately when she received a written rather

than verbal progress interview on April 28, 2000.

On July 1, 2002, complainant filed a civil action (identified as

Civil Action No. 02-1255) in the United States District Court for the

District of Colorado. The record further discloses that the claims

raised therein are the same as those raised in the instant complaint.

The regulation found at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409 provides that the filing

of a civil action "shall terminate Commission processing of the appeal."

Commission regulations mandate dismissal of the EEO complaint under these

circumstances so as to prevent a complainant from simultaneously pursuing

both administrative and judicial remedies on the same matters, wasting

resources, and creating the potential for inconsistent or conflicting

decisions, and in order to grant due deference to the authority of

the federal district court. See Stromgren v. Department of Veterans

Affairs, EEOC Request No. 05891079 (May 7, 1990); Sandy v. Department of

Justice, EEOC Appeal No. 01893513 (October 19, 1989); Kotwitz v. United

States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05880114 (October 25, 1988).

Accordingly, complainant's appeal is hereby dismissed. See 29 C.F.R. �

1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 22, 2002

__________________

Date