Ruth E. Royal, Appellant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 23, 1998
05970645 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 23, 1998)

05970645

11-23-1998

Ruth E. Royal, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Ruth E. Royal v. United States Postal Service

05970645

November 23, 1998

Ruth E. Royal, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Request No. 05970645

) Appeal No. 01963574

William J. Henderson, ) Agency No. 1D251101295

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

___________________________________)

DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

On March 31, 1997, the agency timely initiated a request to the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission to reconsider the decision in Ruth

E. Royal v. Marvin T. Runyon, Jr., Postmaster General, United States

Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01963574 (February 24, 1997), which

it received on February 28, 1997.<1> EEOC Regulations provide that

the Commissioners may, in their discretion, reconsider any previous

Commission decision. 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(a). The party requesting

reconsideration must submit written argument or evidence which tends to

establish one or more of the following three criteria: new and material

evidence is available that was not readily available when the previous

decision was issued, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(1); the previous decision

involved an erroneous interpretation of law, regulation or material fact,

or misapplication of established policy, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(2);

and the previous decision is of such exceptional nature as to have

substantial precedential implications, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(3).

After a review of the agency's request for reconsideration, the previous

decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request

does not meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c), and it is the

decision of the Commission to deny the agency's request. The decision

of the Commission in Appeal No. 01963574 remains the Commission's

final decision. The agency shall process appellant's allegation in

accordance with our order in Appeal No. 01963574, as modified below.

There is no further right of administrative appeal from a decision of

the Commission on a request for reconsideration.

ORDER

1. Within ten (10) calendar days of the date that it receives this

decision, the agency shall acknowledge to the appellant that it has

received the remanded allegation for processing in accordance with 29

C.F.R. 1614.108. The agency shall process the remanded allegation and

shall issue to appellant a copy of the investigative file and also shall

notify appellant of the appropriate rights within one hundred and fifty

(150) calendar days of the date that it receives this decision, unless

the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the appellant

requests a final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a

final decision within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of appellant's

request.

2. The above-mentioned acknowledgment letter shall also invite the

appellant to meet with an identified EEO counselor within fifteen (15)

calendar days of her receiving the letter for counseling regarding the

allegations she submitted to the agency in her March 1996 letter. If the

appellant chooses to pursue any of those allegations under 29 C.F.R. 1614,

the agency shall process those allegations in accordance with those

regulations.

3. A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to appellant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503 (a). The appellant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503 (g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to

the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the

appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court. It is the position of the Commission that you

have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. You should be aware, however, that courts in some

jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner

suggesting that a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your

civil action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN

THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision

or to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the

jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. In the alternative,

you may file a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR

DAYS of the date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your

appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME

AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY

HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME

AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of

your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

NOV 23, 1998

Date Frances M. Hart

Executive Officer

Executive Secretariat

1The last day of the period for filing a request for reconsideration fell

on Sunday, March 30, 1997. The agency submitted its request for

reconsideration by facsimile on the next business day, Monday, March 31,

1997. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(d). Its request is therefore timely.