Robert S. Snow, Appellant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 30, 1999
01990651_r (E.E.O.C. Apr. 30, 1999)

01990651_r

04-30-1999

Robert S. Snow, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Robert S. Snow, )

Appellant, )

)

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01990651

) Agency No. 4E-800-0051-98

)

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

______________________________)

DISMISSAL OF APPEAL

By Notice of Appeal postmarked October 27, 1998, appellant filed an appeal

with this Commission from the September 2, 1998 final agency decision

(FAD) finding no discrimination.

Appellant acknowledged receipt of the FAD on September 25, 1998. A review

of the FAD reveals that the agency properly advised appellant that he had

thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of its final decision to file his

appeal with the Commission. Therefore, in order to be considered timely,

appellant had to file his appeal no later than October 26, 1998.<1>

On appeal, appellant asserted that he was unable to timely submit his

appeal because of medication he was taking. However, we have consistently

held, in cases involving physical or mental health difficulties, that an

extension is warranted only where an individual is so incapacitated by his

condition that he is unable to meet the regulatory time limits. See Davis

v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05980475 (August 6,

1998); Crear v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05920700

(October 29, 1992); Weinberger v. Department of the Army, EEOC Request

No. 05920040 (February 21, 1992); Hickman v. Department of the Navy,

EEOC Request No. 05910707 (September 30, 1991); Johnson v. Department of

Health and Human Services, EEOC Request No. 05900873 (October 5, 1990);

and Zelmer v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05890164

(March 8, 1989). In the instant case, appellant provided no evidence

showing he was so incapacitated by his medication that he was unable to

meet the regulatory time limit. Accordingly, appellant's October 27,

1998 appeal is hereby DISMISSED. See 29 C.F.R. ��1614.402 and 1614.604.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT

IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT

HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

April 30, 1999

____________________________

DATE Ronnie Blumenthal, Director

Office of Federal Operations1The thirtieth day following

appellant's receipt of the agency decision fell on Sunday,

October 25, 1998, requiring an extension of the time period for

the filing of appellant's appeal to the next business day, Monday,

October 26, 1998. 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(d).