Robert Provencio, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 10, 2004
01a32898 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 10, 2004)

01a32898

02-10-2004

Robert Provencio, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Robert Provencio v. United States Postal Service

01A32898

February 10, 2004

.

Robert Provencio,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A32898

Agency No. 4G-760-0081-03

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the final

agency decision dated March 12, 2003, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., and

the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.

In his formal complaint, filed on January 30, 2003, complainant alleged

that he was subjected to discrimination on the bases of race (Hispanic),

national origin (Hispanic), age (D.O.B. 1/17/50), and reprisal for prior

EEO activity when:

On September 27, 2002, he received a letter from a named agency official

instructing complainant to recuse himself of activities that could be

perceived as retaliatory to any employee, including the decision to

equalize the 2002 budget spread for the office;

On several occasions, in an attempt to damage his career, a named agency

official, made statements to complainant indicating that complainant

could be subjected to investigation and removal.

On October 10, 2002, a named agency official threatened to resurrect

an investigation against complainant if he did not stop engaging in

EEO activity;

On October 17, 2002, and January 21, 2003, complainant was confronted

and berated by a named agency official, in an inappropriate, loud voice;

In November 2002, a named agency official denied his request for a

lateral transfer to Sacramento;

In December 2002, complainant was informed and believed that a named

agency official authorized, condoned and ratified falsification of the

results of the city carrier route inspection in the Arlington, Texas

post office; and

On an unspecified date, a named agency official collected and maintained

unauthorized records on complainant in violation of the Privacy Act and

ELM 313.431.

The agency dismissed complainant's complaint for failure to state a

claim. Specifically, the agency determined that complainant had failed

to demonstrate that he was an aggrieved employee within the meaning of

EEOC Regulations. In addition, the agency determined that complainant's

complaint alleged that his rights had been violated under the Privacy Act,

which is outside the purview of the EEO process. The agency dismissed

the complaint for failure to state a claim in accordance with EEOC

Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1).

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides, in

relevant part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint that fails to

state a claim. An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved

employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been

discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion,

sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.103,

.106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has long defined

an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss with

respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which

there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request

No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).

Claims (1) - (4) and (6)

Upon review of the record herein, the Commission finds that claims (1)

- (4) and (6) fail to state a claim under the EEOC regulations because

complainant failed to show that he suffered harm or loss with respect to a

term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy.

See Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049

(April 21, 1994). Moreover, a review of the record reflects that the

matters in question are insufficient to support a claim of harassment.

See Cobb v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05970077 (March

13, 1997). Accordingly, the agency's decision to dismiss claims (1) -

(4) and (6) in accordance with EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)

was proper and is AFFIRMED.

Claim 5

Upon review, the Commission finds that claim (5), regarding the denial of

complainant's request for a lateral transfer, was improperly dismissed for

failing to state a claim. Complainant has alleged that he was subjected

to discrimination based on his race, national origin, age and in reprisal

for his prior EEO activity when his request for a lateral transfer to

Sacramento was denied in November 2002. We find that complainant has

stated a justiciable claim of employment discrimination in this claim.

Accordingly, the agency's decision to dismiss claim (5) is REVERSED.

Claim (7)

Regarding claim (7), the Commission finds that to the extent that

complainant is alleging a Privacy Act violation, we note that such a

claim is outside the purview of the Commission. See Bucci v. Department

of Education, EEOC Request Nos. 05890289, 05890290, 05890291 (April 12,

1989). The Commission finds that the agency's decision dismissing claim

(7) was proper and is AFFIRMED.

In summary, the agency's decision dismissing claims (1) - (4), (6)

and (7) is AFFIRMED for the reasons set forth herein. The agency's

decision dismissing claim (5) is REVERSED and that claim is REMANDED to

the agency for further processing in accordance with this decision and

the order below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claim in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claim within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0900)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar

days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after

one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your

complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until

such time as the agency issues its final decision on your complaint.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file

a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

February 10, 2004

__________________

Date