Robert M. Paitchel, Complainant,v.Stephen A. Perry, Administrator, General Services Administration, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 27, 2003
01A21615_r (E.E.O.C. Feb. 27, 2003)

01A21615_r

02-27-2003

Robert M. Paitchel, Complainant, v. Stephen A. Perry, Administrator, General Services Administration, Agency.


Robert M. Paitchel v. General Services Administration

01A21615

February 27, 2003

.

Robert M. Paitchel,

Complainant,

v.

Stephen A. Perry,

Administrator,

General Services Administration,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A21615

Agency No. GSAEEO20010045

DECISION

The EEO Counselor's report indicates that complainant initiated contact

with the agency's EEO Office on April 17, 2001. In a formal EEO complaint

dated June 26, 2001, complainant claimed that he was discriminated

against on the bases of his disabilities (cardiac arrhythmia, depression,

anxiety, Epstein-Barr syndrome, recurring melanomas and melanocytes) and

in reprisal for his previous EEO activity under the Rehabilitation Act.

The agency defined the claims as being that from May 1999 through January

2001, complainant was subjected to a hostile work environment, denied

a within grade increase, denied reasonable accommodations, he did not

receive a performance award, and that the harassment forced him to retire.

By decision dated December 14, 2001, the agency dismissed the complaint

on the grounds that complainant failed to initiate contact with an EEO

Counselor in a timely manner. The agency determined that complainant

initiated EEO contact on April 17, 2001, more than 45 days after the

most recent event of complainant's filing of a disability retirement

application on January 25, 2001. The agency also determined that

complainant failed to file a formal complaint within 15 days of his

final interview.

On appeal, complainant contends that although some of the alleged

incidents occurred before he filed for a disability retirement, his

working conditions and some events continued through June 8, 2001,

his last day of work.

Initially, with regard to the agency's dismissal of the complaint on the

grounds that it was filed in an untimely manner, we note that the agency

has not established when complainant received his notice of right to file

a discrimination complaint. The formal complaint was received by the

agency on July 6, 2001. Therefore, we can not find that the complaint

was untimely filed.

As for the timeliness of complainant's EEO contact, we observe that the

record is incomplete and unclear with regard to the alleged incidents.

We note for example that complainant was apparently denied a within grade

increase in January 2000, but the record indicates that another within

grade increase was denied the following year. It is also not clear

when complainant was denied a performance award. The agency decision

stated that the alleged discrimination occurred from May 1999 through

January 2001. However, complainant claims that some of the incidents

continued through June 8, 2001, his last day of work.

In light of the lack of clarity in the record, we VACATE the agency's

dismissal of the complaint on the grounds of untimely EEO contact and

REMAND this matter for further processing in accordance with this decision

and the Order herein.

ORDER

The agency shall contact complainant with regard to ascertaining the

exact dates of the incidents that are at issue in the instant complaint.

The agency is instructed to request that complainant provide the exact

or approximate dates for each of the claims that has been raised in

the instant complaint. The agency shall send a letter to complainant

requesting such information 15 calendar days after the date this decision

becomes final. The agency shall allot complainant 15 calendar days from

the date that he receives its letter to submit his response. Thereafter,

within 45 days of the date this decision becomes final, the agency shall

issue a notice of acceptance of the complaint or shall issue a final

action with regard to this complaint.

A copy of the agency's new decision or letter of acceptance must be sent

to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

February 27, 2003

__________________

Date