Richard T. Smith, Appellant,v.Donna A. Tanoue, Chairperson, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 18, 1998
01981019 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 18, 1998)

01981019

11-18-1998

Richard T. Smith, Appellant, v. Donna A. Tanoue, Chairperson, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Agency.


Richard T. Smith, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01981019

) Agency No. FDIC-95-67

Donna A. Tanoue, )

Chairperson, )

Federal Deposit Insurance )

Corporation, )

Agency. )

______________________________)

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency improperly dismissed

appellant's complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 29

C.F.R. �1614.107(a). In the complaint, appellant alleged that he was

denied reclassification and promotion to a Minority and Women Business

Officer, GG-301-14 position. The agency dismissed appellant's complaint

for failure to state a claim finding that after appellant initiated

EEO counseling, a desk audit was requested for appellant's position;

however, appellant objected to an audit until he spoke with the EEO

Counselor. According to the agency, a desk audit is required prior

to the reclassification of a position and, therefore, appellant was

not aggrieved by an agency action, but rather by his own refusal to

undergo an audit. We find, however, that appellant is aggrieved since

he alleged that he was improperly denied reclassification and promotion.

Whether that the subject denial is a result of appellant's refusal to

undergo a desk audit is an issue that goes to the merits of appellant's

complaint, and is irrelevant to the procedural issue of whether he has

stated a justiciable claim under Title VII. See Ferrazzoli v. USPS,

EEOC Request No. 05910642 (August 15, 1991). Based on the foregoing,

we find that appellant's complaint states a claim. Accordingly,

the agency's decision is REVERSED, and the complaint is REMANDED to

the agency for further processing. Since at the time of dismissal,

appellant's complaint had been pending before an Administrative Judge

(AJ) for a hearing, the agency shall resume processing in accordance

with the Order below.

ORDER

The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded complaint in accordance with

29 C.F.R. �1614.109. Specifically, the agency shall forward appellant's

case to the EEOC Washington Field Office for rescheduling of a hearing,

requesting assignment of an Administrative Judge. The agency shall

forward appellant's case to an AJ within thirty (30) calendar days of the

date this decision becomes final. A copy of the agency's correspondence

that transmits the case to the Administrative Judge must be sent to the

Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The

agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report

shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503(a). The appellant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. ��1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503(g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. ��1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to

the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the

appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court. It is the position of the Commission that you

have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. You should be aware, however, that courts in some

jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner

suggesting that a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your

civil action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN

THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision

or to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the

jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. In the alternative,

you may file a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR

DAYS of the date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your

appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME

AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY

HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME

AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of

your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

November 18, 1998

DATE Ronnie Blumenthal, Director

Office of Federal Operations