Richard J. Mulcahy, Complainant,v.Janet Napolitano, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, (Transportation Security Administration), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 6, 2010
0120081233 (E.E.O.C. May. 6, 2010)

0120081233

05-06-2010

Richard J. Mulcahy, Complainant, v. Janet Napolitano, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, (Transportation Security Administration), Agency.


Richard J. Mulcahy,

Complainant,

v.

Janet Napolitano,

Secretary,

Department of Homeland Security,

(Transportation Security Administration),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120081233

Agency No. HS 07-TSA-001472

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely

EEO Counselor contact. In his complaint, dated July 17, 2007, complainant

alleged discrimination based on sex (male) and age (over 40) when: (1)

on May 23, 2006, he learned that the Deputy Federal Security Director

denied his request for a third opportunity to take the recertification

test; and (2) on May 24, 2006, his employment was terminated.

The agency stated that complainant did not contact an EEO Counselor

with regard to the alleged incidents until March 14, 2007, which was

beyond 45-day time limit set by the regulations. We note that the

record contains a copy of complainant's electronic message dated July

31, 2006, to the agency's EEO/Civil Rights Office indicating that he

"found out that two females who failed to pass the x-ray re-certification

test were permitted to take the test for the third time and they are

currently employed." It appears that complainant was seeking assistance

to further process the alleged discriminatory incidents, i.e., through

agency EEO complaint process. Thus, we will consider the July 31, 2006

date as complainant's initial EEO Counselor contact date, and we find

that it was beyond the 45-day time limit by the regulations.

On appeal, complainant contends that he was never informed of the time

limit. However, the EEO Counselor's Report indicates that complainant

actually contacted an EEO Counselor on March 14, 2007, and told the

Counselor during counseling that he was indeed aware of the 45-day

time limit to contact an EEO Counselor, but he was trying to get the

situation resolved through the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) and the

management officials before contacting an EEO Counselor. On appeal,

complainant does not dispute the foregoing EEO Counselor's statement.

The record indicates that complainant filed a DRB appeal on June 20,

2006, which was, subsequently, denied. However, the Commission has held

that the internal appeal of an agency action does not toll the running

of EEO time limitations. See Hosford v. Veterans Administration, EEOC

Request No. 05890038 (June 9, 1989).

On appeal, complainant has presented no persuasive arguments or

evidence warranting an extension of the time limit for initiating EEO

Counselor contact. Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing

complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

5/6/10

__________________

Date

2

0120081233

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013