Richard D. Blackwell, Complainant,v.Gary Locke, Secretary, Department of Commerce (Bureau of the Census), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJan 12, 2012
0120113675 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 12, 2012)

0120113675

01-12-2012

Richard D. Blackwell, Complainant, v. Gary Locke, Secretary, Department of Commerce (Bureau of the Census), Agency.




Richard D. Blackwell,

Complainant,

v.

Gary Locke,

Secretary,

Department of Commerce

(Bureau of the Census),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120113675

Agency No. 10-63-00359D

DECISION

Complainant appeals to the Commission from the Agency’s final decision

dated July 1, 2011, finding no discrimination. For the following reasons,

we AFFIRM the Agency’s final decision.

BACKGROUND

Complainant filed his complaint dated March 25, 2010, alleging

discrimination based on race (African-American) when he was terminated on

January 15, 2010. After completion of the investigation of the complaint,

Complainant did not request a hearing. The Agency, thus, issued its final

Agency decision concluding that it asserted legitimate, nondiscriminatory

reasons for its action, which Complainant failed to rebut.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

After a review of the record, we, assuming arguendo that Complainant had

established a prima facie case of discrimination, find that the Agency

has articulated legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for the alleged

termination. The record indicates that on January 5, 2009, Complainant

previously accepted a temporary excepted service, Schedule A appointment

as a Partnership Specialist at the Buffalo Local Census Office with a

not-to-exceed date of September 25, 2010. The Agency indicated that on

January 15, 2010, Complainant was terminated from his appointment for

unacceptable conduct for the misuse of his government issued travel charge

card. Specifically, the Agency stated that Complainant was delinquent

in his government credit card payments for a period of 61 - 90 days

with an outstanding balance of $2,070.48. The Agency also indicated

that Complainant used his travel charge card to pay for his personal

expenses related to the repair of his personal vehicle and to pay for

car rental expenses over the course of three months while his own vehicle

was being repaired which were unauthorized and in violation of policies

pertaining to the use of his travel card. Report of Investigation (ROI),

Exhibit (Ex.) 22. Complainant does not dispute the foregoing statements.

The Agency stated that on January 19, 2009, Complainant was previously

provided with training on the usage of his travel card at the time of its

issuance. ROI, Ex. 23. Complainant does not dispute this. Upon review,

Complainant failed to provide any similarly situated employees outside

of his protected classes who were treated differently or more favorably.

Based on the foregoing, we find that Complainant has failed to show that

the Agency’s action was motivated by discrimination as he alleged.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Agency’s final decision finding no discrimination

is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency

head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full

name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal

of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File a Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

1/12/12

__________________

Date

2

0120113675

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120113675