Richard A. Becker, Complainant,v.Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 2, 2003
01A30392_r (E.E.O.C. May. 2, 2003)

01A30392_r

05-02-2003

Richard A. Becker, Complainant, v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Richard A. Becker v. Department of Veterans Affairs

01A30392

May 2, 2003

.

Richard A. Becker,

Complainant,

v.

Anthony J. Principi,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A30392

Agency No. 200M02103184

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to

state a claim.<1> In a complaint dated June 21, 2002, complainant alleged

that he was subjected to discrimination on the bases of disability, age

(D.O.B. 4/4/36), and reprisal for contacting the Department of Labor when:

In November 2001, the complainant expressed an interest in employment

for Retail Management, but was not hired and received no response from

the management officials;

In February 2002, the complainant expressed interest in employment

for Retail Management, but was not hired and received no response from

management officials; and

On May 7, 2002, the complainant expressed interest in employment for

Retail Management but was not hired and received no response from

management officials.

The Commission finds that the complaint fails to state a claim under the

EEOC regulations because complainant failed to show that he suffered harm

or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment

for which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Department of the Air Force,

EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). Specifically, we note

that complainant does not dispute the agency's contention that his

inquiries about employment with the agency were not made in response to

vacancy announcements. We find that the agency's failure to respond to

unsolicited letters expressing an interest in employment does not state

a cognizable claim.

Further, we note that on appeal complainant attempts to amend his

complaint to include additional incidents of on going discrimination.

Specifically, he references a non-selection for the position of Retail

Manager and/or the Manager trainee program which he alleges occurred in

September 2002. Complainant is advised that if he wishes to raise this

claim and has not already done so, he should contact an EEO Counselor

within fifteen days of receiving this decision.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

May 2, 2003

__________________

Date

1Because we are affirming the dismissal of

complainant's complaint for failure to state a claim, we will not address

the agency's alternative grounds of dismissal.