Reynaldo S. Gaor, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 27, 2002
01A22461_r (E.E.O.C. Jun. 27, 2002)

01A22461_r

06-27-2002

Reynaldo S. Gaor, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Reynaldo S. Gaor v. United States Postal Service

01A22461

June 27, 2002

.

Reynaldo S. Gaor,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A22461

Agency No. 1F-901-0134-01

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated March 5, 2002, finding no breach of an October 1, 2001

settlement agreement. The Commission hereby accepts the appeal in

accordance with EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504(b).

The settlement agreement provided the following:

"[Complainant's supervisor] agrees to rescind the Restricted Sick Leave

(RSL) Notice issued on 6/13/01; [Complainant's supervisor] shall cease

harassment and intimidation, threats and retaliation against [complainant]

for filing EEO. [Complainant's supervisor] shall stop abusive management

style and if he does another complaint will be filed."

The record indicates that on November 1, 2001 and January 7, 2002,

complainant completed EEO informal counseling forms in which he alleged

that the agency breached the October 1, 2001 settlement. Specifically,

complainant alleged that his supervisor continues to engage in reprisal

against him in the form of on-going harassment and intimidation,

including but not limited to denying his leave requests and assigning

him work without formal training. Complainant alleges also that the

agency's conduct was in retaliation for his filing an EEO complaint.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504(b) provides that if a complainant

believes that the agency has failed to comply with the terms of a

settlement agreement, he may request that the terms of the agreement

be specifically implemented, or alternatively, that the complaint be

reinstated for further processing. However, the Commission has held that

claims contending that subsequent acts of discrimination or harassment

violate a settlement agreement shall be processed as separate complaints

rather than as a claim of breach. See generally Holley v. Department of

Veterans Affairs, EEOC Request No. 05950842 (November 13, 1997). Here,

we find that complainant is raising new claims of reprisal regarding

incidents occurring subsequent to the settlement agreement. Therefore,

under EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504(c), we find that these claims

must be processed as new claims of discrimination. We note that the

record contains a copy of a letter of acknowledgment dated April 15,

2002, indicating that complainant's new allegations were accepted for

investigation in Agency Case No. 1F-901-0014-02.

Accordingly, the agency's finding of no breach of the settlement agreement

is AFFIRMED for the reasons set forth herein.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

June 27, 2002

__________________

Date