[Redacted], Darin B., 1 Complainant,v.Janet L. Yellen, Secretary, Department of the Treasury (Internal Revenue Service), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Mar 11, 2021

Appeal No. 2019004220 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 11, 2021)

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Federal Operations P.O. Box 77960 Washington, DC 20013 Darin B.,1 Complainant, v. Janet L. Yellen, Secretary, Department of the Treasury (Internal Revenue Service), Agency. Request No. 2021001199 Appeal No. 2019004220 Hearing No. 480-2014-00420X & 480-2014-00421X Agency No. IRS-13-0226-F & IRS-13-0354-F DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION Complainant requested that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) reconsider its decision in EEOC Appeal No. 2019004220 (November 2, 2020). EEOC regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision issued pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(a), where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(b). By regulation, requests must be filed within thirty (30) calendar days after the party receives the previous decision. 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(b). A document is timely if it is received or postmarked before the expiration of the applicable filing period or, in the absence of a legible postmark, if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(b). 1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant’s name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website. 2021001199 2 It is noted that the Commission’s previous decision included a Certificate of Mailing indicating that, for purposes of timeliness, the Commission would presume that the decision was received within five (5) calendar days of the date on which it was mailed (October 2, 2020). Therefore, Complainant is presumed to have received the previous decision no later than October 7, 2020. Thirty days from that date is November 6, 2020. As evidenced by the post mark date, Complainant mailed his request on November 25, 2020, which was beyond the 30-day limit set by regulation. In his request, Complainant says that the original appellate decision was sent to an incorrect address. He states that he does not reside in Arcadia, California. However, he provides no new address. He does not provide a copy of the envelope in which the decision was mailed. He does not explain how he finally received the decision. Further, on the envelope in which his request was mailed, he uses the Commission’s address as the return address rather than his own address. Thus, because no new address is provided, we cannot determine if the decision was received when he says it was or whether it was sent to an incorrect address. Additionally, we have no other address for Complainant. For the foregoing reasons, Complainant's request is denied. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 2019004220 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request. COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610) This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission’s decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815) If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. 2021001199 3 Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant’s Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits). FOR THE COMMISSION: ______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden’s signature Carlton M. Hadden, Director Office of Federal Operations March 11, 2021 Date