Ramona Powell, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 23, 2002
01A05860 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 23, 2002)

01A05860

09-23-2002

Ramona Powell, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Ramona Powell v. United States Postal Service

01A05860

September 23, 2002

.

Ramona Powell,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A05860

Agency No. 4G-770-0419-99

Hearing No. 330-A0-8110X

DECISION

Complainant timely initiated an appeal from a final agency action

concerning her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in

violation of Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation

Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. The appeal is accepted

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405.

The record reveals that during the relevant time, complainant was

employed in a limited duty position as a Modified Distribution Clerk

at the agency's facility in Port Arthur, Texas. Complainant sought EEO

counseling and subsequently filed a formal complaint on August 3, 1999,

alleging that she was discriminated against on the basis of disability

(Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Lower Back, and Left Leg) when on

April 29, 1999, her supervisors refused to allow her to work within her

medical restrictions.

At the conclusion of the investigation, complainant was provided a

copy of the investigative file and requested a hearing before an EEOC

Administrative Judge (AJ). The AJ issued a decision without a hearing

finding no discrimination. The AJ found that there was conflicting

evidence within the record as to whether complainant was permitted to

move around during her assignment. In her finding, the AJ determined

that the complaint involves the agency's adherence to the Department of

Labor's findings. Therefore, the AJ concluded that the Department of

Labor had sole jurisdiction of the matter and that the case was improperly

before the Commission. Accordingly, the AJ recommended that the agency

issue a final decision finding no discrimination.

The agency's final action implemented the AJ's decision. This appeal

followed without comment from either party.

The record indicates that, due to her medical limitations, complainant

was unable to perform her regular duties as a city carrier. Therefore,

the agency provided complainant a reasonable accommodation in the

form of a reassignment to a limited duty position in December 1999.

Complainant filed her EEO complaint when on January 29, 1999, her

supervisors ordered her to sit in a storage room and instructed her that

she was to stay in that room and continue to sit at a table. She alleged

that she was not permitted to get up and walk around as required per her

medical restrictions. She averred that she informed them that their

instruction was in violation with her medical restrictions related

to her Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Upon review, the Commission

finds that complainant is alleging that the agency failed to provide her

with a reasonable accommodation due to the supervisors' instructions.

Accordingly, contrary to the AJ's conclusion, we find that complainant

has alleged a violation of the Rehabilitation Act which is properly

before the Commission.<1>

Accordingly, the agency's final action is vacated, and the complaint is

remanded for further processing in accordance with the order below.

ORDER

The agency shall submit to the Hearings Unit of the appropriate EEOC

field office within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date this decision

becomes final a request for an EEOC AJ to process the remanded complaint

4G-770-0419-99. With this request the agency shall submit a copy of

the complaint file, including administrative and investigatory files,

all correspondence to and from the AJ by the parties, and this decision.

Thereafter, the AJ shall issue a decision in accordance with 29 C.F.R. �

1614.109,<2> and the agency shall issue a final action in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.110 within forty (40) days of receipt of the AJ decision.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 23, 2002

__________________

Date

1We note that the record is deficient and should be further developed

by complainant with respect to her coverage under the Rehabilitation

Act specifically as to her lower back and left leg conditions.

2The AJ will apply this regulation to decide whether a hearing is

appropriate.