Phillip M. Duse, Complainant,v.William S. Cohen, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Defense Logistics Agency), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 8, 1999
01992684 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 8, 1999)

01992684

12-08-1999

Phillip M. Duse, Complainant, v. William S. Cohen, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Defense Logistics Agency), Agency.


Phillip M. Duse, )

Complainant, )

) Appeal No. 01992684

v. ) Agency No. HC-97-004

)

William S. Cohen, )

Secretary, )

Department of Defense, )

(Defense Logistics Agency), )

Agency. )

)

DISMISSAL OF APPEAL

In this case, complainant, on February 12, 1999, filed an appeal with

this Commission from a final decision of the agency concerning Complaint

No. HC-97-004.<1> The agency's decision found that he had not been

subjected to unlawful employment discrimination because of his race

(Black), color (black), and previous EEO activity. Subsequently, on

September 17, 1999, complainant filed a civil action, Case No. 99-1400-A,

in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

Virginia. A review of the civil action indicates that it encompasses

the allegations raised in complainant's Complaint No. HC-97-004. In

paragraph 4 of his pleading, complainant stated, among other things, that:

[b]eginning with issues alleged in an initial [sic] two EEO complaints,

filed against the Defense Logistics Agency in 1992/93 and a third

complaint filed against the agency in 1996, (Agency Nos. ZA-93-001,

HC-94-001 and HC-97-004) the plaintiff alleged discrimination in

promotion, performance appraisal, tort activity and retaliation for

previous complaints. The plaintiff duly registered the complaints with

the EEOC and duly appealed [the] agency finding of no discrimination,

through council [sic] and self, appeal #01956449 [1992/93 complaints]

and EEOC Docket No. 01992684, [1996 complaint]. The plaintiff, having

complied with agency in-house procedures and exhausted all remedies,

now seeks relief and compensation, through trial by jury, for the justice

denied by the agency and EEOC adjudication process.

Id. (Emphasis added). In 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be

codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409), the

regulations provide that filing a civil action under 29 C.F.R. � 1614.407

or � 1614.408 shall terminate all Commission processing of an appeal.

Since complainant, by filing the above referenced civil action, has

elected to proceed in the Federal Court system, all administrative

processing of his complaint is terminated. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1199)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS

OF RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See

64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405). All requests and arguments must be

submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the

absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed

timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration

of the applicable filing period. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999)

(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604).

The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the

other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S1199)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS

THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

__12-08-99____________ __________________________________

DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

_________________________

__________________________1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations

governing the EEOC's federal sector complaint process went into effect.

These regulations apply to all Federal sector EEO complaints pending at

any stage in the administrative process. Consequently, the Commission

will apply the revised regulations found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999),

where applicable, in deciding the present appeal. The regulations,

as amended, may also be found at the Commission's website at WWW.EEOC.GOV.