Pauline M. Yamane, Complainant,v.Thomas E. White, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 6, 2002
01a20421_r (E.E.O.C. Feb. 6, 2002)

01a20421_r

02-06-2002

Pauline M. Yamane, Complainant, v. Thomas E. White, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.


Pauline M. Yamane v. Department of the Army

01A20421

February 6, 2002

.

Pauline M. Yamane,

Complainant,

v.

Thomas E. White,

Secretary,

Department of the Army,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A20421

Agency No. AOEWFO0104B0130

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency's decision dated October

4, 2001, dismissing complainant's complaint for failure to state a claim

is proper pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). The instant complaint

involved alleged improper remarks made by agency employees concerning

complainant's height and a hostile work environment.

The record indicates that at the time of the alleged incidents,

complainant was not employed by an agency, but was a participant

in the Work Hawaii Program with the City and County of Honolulu.

The record indicates that the Work Hawaii Program was responsible for

the payment of complainant's salary, payroll taxes, and appropriate

fringe benefits. Specifically, the record indicates that complainant

signed and acknowledged the terms of her temporary employment with the

City and County of Honolulu. The record also indicates that the agency

did not provide complainant with annual, sick, holiday or other leave

with pay provisions. The agency did not reimburse complainant for any

expenses or provide her with medical insurance, retirement benefits or

temporary or long term disability benefits. The agency stated that

its obligation was to provide necessary supervision, training, work

equipment and/or materials to enable complainant to perform her duties

and to provide her sufficient work to occupy a full day. The agency

also stated that it was responsible for maintaining and submitting to

the Work Hawaii Program accurate sign-in/out sheets for verification of

complainant's working hours. Based on the foregoing, the Commission finds

that complainant was not an agency employee. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.103;

Ma v. Department of Health and Human Services, EEOC Appeal No. 01962390

(June 1, 1998) (citing Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Darden,

503 U.S. 218, 323-24 (1992)). Thus, the Commission finds that the

complaint fails to state a claim within the purview of the regulations.

Accordingly, the agency's decision is hereby AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

February 6, 2002

__________________

Date