01976623
11-04-1998
Patricia A. Rhodes, Appellant, v. Robert E. Rubin, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.
Patricia A. Rhodes v. Department of the Treasury
01976623
November 4, 1998
Patricia A. Rhodes, )
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Appeal No. 01976623
) Agency No. 97-3249
Robert E. Rubin, )
Secretary, )
Department of the Treasury, )
Agency. )
)
DECISION
The appellant timely filed an appeal with this Commission from a final
decision, dated August 6, 1997, which the agency issued pursuant to EEOC
Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(b) and (d). The Commission accepts the
appellant's appeal in accordance with EEOC Order No. 960, as amended.
The final agency decision dismissed the appellant's complaint in its
entirety for untimely EEO counselor contact. In addition, the decision
dismissed portions of the complaint on the ground that they concerned
matters previously raised in grievances under a negotiated grievance
procedure which permits allegations of discrimination to be raised.
After a review of the record, including the appellant's appeal
submissions, the Commission finds that the appellant did not timely seek
EEO counseling on March 26, 1997, regarding discrimination which allegedly
occurred during the period from February 1995 through September 1996.
The appellant contends on appeal that she had been told by the union
and others that she could not simultaneously file a grievance and a
complaint with the EEO Office. However, the appellant has not alleged
that any agency officials misled her to believe that she could file an
EEO complaint after pursuing a grievance. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).
In addition, even after the union resolved the appellant's grievances and
those of other employees in September 1995 and August 1996, the appellant
did not seek EEO counseling. Instead, with the assistance of counsel, the
appellant chose to file a unfair labor practice (ULP) complaint against
the union. The Commission repeatedly has held that the initiation of other
appeal processes does not toll the time limit for seeking EEO counseling.
See, e.g., Linda E. Moy� v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request
No. 05940107 (November 30, 1994) (denial of the appellant's suggestion
by higher level officials following a previous denial of the appellant's
suggestion by lower-level officials); Dorothy Pappillion v. United
States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05931015 (April 28, 1994) (union
grievance); Delora E. Jones v. Department of Justice, EEOC Request
No. 05930909 (March 17, 1994) (informal attempts to resolve problem);
Teresa Mathews v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05930887
(January 21, 1994); and Leota Hartsell v. United States Postal Service,
EEOC Request No. 05930428 (July 16, 1993) (performance appraisal appeal).
CONCLUSION
For the reasons stated above, the Commission AFFIRMS the agency's
dismissal of the appellant's July 8, 1997 complaint.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0795)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available
when the previous decision was issued; or
2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,
regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or
3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial
precedential implications.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST
BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this
decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive
a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in
opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider
MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party
WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request
to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments
must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,
the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received
by the Commission.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances
have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,
a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the
delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your
request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests
for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited
circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).
RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)
It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file
a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN
NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.
You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have
interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that
a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the
date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action
is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)
CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult
an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction
in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil action,
YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE
OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS
OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in
the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the
national organization, and not the local office, facility or department
in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a
civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative
processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
November 4, 1998
______________
Date Ronnie Blumenthal, Director
Office of Federal Operations