Monica O. Nwevo, Complainant,v.Donald L. Evans, Secretary, Department of Commerce, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJan 14, 2003
01a24603_r (E.E.O.C. Jan. 14, 2003)

01a24603_r

01-14-2003

Monica O. Nwevo, Complainant, v. Donald L. Evans, Secretary, Department of Commerce, Agency.


Monica O. Nwevo v. Department of Commerce

01A24603

January 14, 2003

.

Monica O. Nwevo,

Complainant,

v.

Donald L. Evans,

Secretary,

Department of Commerce,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A24603

Agency No. 00-63-02709D

Hearing No. 330-A1-8180X

DECISION

The record indicates that complainant filed an appeal from the agency's

final action dated August 7, 2002, concerning her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

In her complaint, complainant, a former Enumerator, alleged that she

was discriminated against based on race/color (unspecified/off-coffee),

religion (Catholic), sex (female), and national origin (Nigerian) when

on May 10, 2000, she was terminated from her temporary appointment.

The record indicates that at the conclusion of the investigation,

complainant requested a hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ).

The AJ, after a hearing, issued a decision finding no discrimination,

which was implemented by the agency in its final action.

After a review of the record, the Commission finds that, assuming arguendo

that complainant had established a prima facie case of discrimination, the

agency articulated legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for its action.

Initially, the Commission notes that three days prior to her termination

at issue, complainant was hired as a temporary appointment on May 7,

2000, not-to-exceed July 31, 2000. An agency supervisor testified

that on May 9, 2000, during a training class for newly hired, temporary

employees, complainant began shouting at two other female trainees and

telling them not to laugh at her. The supervisor indicated that she

informed complainant that her behavior and comments were inappropriate

and unacceptable. The supervisor also indicated that she told the

two trainees to sit on the other side of the training class, away from

complainant. The supervisor also testified that on the next day on May

10, 2000, during a practice enumeration session, complainant approached

the two female trainees, began shaking her clipboard at them, accused

them of following her, and threatened them that she would get her son

to kill them.

The Commission finds that complainant failed to show that the agency's

reasons were pretext for discrimination. Complainant did not rebut the

agency's arguments that its action was nothing more than a business

decision without discriminatory motive. The Commission finds that

complainant failed to show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that

she was discriminated against based on race/color, religion, sex, and

national origin.

The agency's decision finding no discrimination is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

January 14, 2003

__________________

Date