Michelle M. Behm, Complainant,v.Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, Department of Transportation, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 27, 2001
01A04826 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 27, 2001)

01A04826

03-27-2001

Michelle M. Behm, Complainant, v. Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, Department of Transportation, Agency.


Michelle M. Behm v. Department of Transportation

01A04826

March 27, 2001

.

Michelle M. Behm,

Complainant,

v.

Norman Y. Mineta,

Secretary,

Department of Transportation,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A04826

Agency No. 4-00-4065

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency's decision dated June

8, 2000, dismissing complainant's complaint for stating the same claim

that had been decided by the agency is proper pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(1). In her complaint, dated May 25, 2000, complainant, an

Assistant Air Traffic Manager, AT-2152-LL, MSS-4, alleged discrimination

based on sex (female) and in reprisal for prior EEO activity when on

February 29, 2000, she received a lower pay increase for October 1999,

than any other MSS-4 grade level employees �that transferred to field

facilities that was FG-15, step 10, on October 1, 1998.� The agency, in

its decision, stated that the instant complaint concerned the alleged pay

conversion/increase which was given to FG-2152 employees who were assigned

to field facilities as of October 1, 1998, and that complainant raised

the same matter in her previous complaints, Agency Nos. 4-99-4106 and

4-00-4041, which were previously decided by the agency.<1> The record

indicates that in her previous complaint, Agency No. 4-00-4041, dated

March 13, 2000, complainant alleged the same matter, i.e., receiving less

pay than other similarly situated male employees due to the October 1,

1998 pay conversion. On appeal, complainant, other than filing a notice

of appeal, does not raise any new matters.

Accordingly, the agency's decision is hereby AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 27, 2001

__________________

Date

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days after it was mailed. I certify

that this decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

__________________

Date

______________________________

1The record indicates that complainant's appeals concerning the agency's

decisions of Agency Nos. 4-99-4106 and 4-00-4041, are pending before

the Commission, in EEOC Appeal Nos. 01A11308 and 01A04827, respectively.