Michael F. Longo, Complainant,v.Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Defense Commissary Agency), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 19, 2004
05A40644 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 19, 2004)

05A40644

04-19-2004

Michael F. Longo, Complainant, v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Defense Commissary Agency), Agency.


Michael F. Longo v. Department of Defense (Defense Commissary Agency)

05A40644

April 19, 2004

.

Michael F. Longo,

Complainant,

v.

Donald H. Rumsfeld,

Secretary,

Department of Defense,

(Defense Commissary Agency),

Agency.

Request No. 05A40644

Appeal No. 01A24811

Agency No. OODCMW41001

Hearing No. 360-A0-8514X

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

Michael F. Longo (complainant) initiated a request to the Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider the decision

in Michael F. Longo v. Department of Defense, EEOC Appeal No. 01A24811

(December 23, 2003). EEOC Regulations provide that a party may request

reconsideration within thirty days of receipt of the previous Commission

decision. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b). Unless evidence to the contrary

is presented, the Commission presumes that a decision is received within

five calendar days after it is mailed.

Complainant filed his request for reconsideration on March 18, 2004.

In his request for reconsideration, complainant contends (without

supporting evidence) that he did not receive the prior decision until

January 3, 2004, which was beyond the five-day time frame. Even assuming

that complainant received the Commission's decision on January 3, 2004 as

he contends, in order for his request for reconsideration to be considered

timely, complainant would have had to file it by February 2, 2004.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. Complainant does not provide any justification for

why an extension of the applicable time limit for filing his request for

reconsideration is warranted. Accordingly, the Commission finds that

the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and

it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision

in EEOC Appeal No. 01A24811 remains the Commission's final decision.

There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of

the Commission on this request for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this

decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

April 19, 2004

__________________

Date