Melvin C. Helms, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 27, 2002
01A20768_r (E.E.O.C. Feb. 27, 2002)

01A20768_r

02-27-2002

Melvin C. Helms, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Melvin C. Helms v. United States Postal Service

01A20768

February 27, 2002

.

Melvin C. Helms,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A20768

Agency No. 4D-280-0027-98

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the

agency's decision dated November 7, 2001, dismissing his complaint of

unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the

Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. �

791 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA),

as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq. In his complaint, complainant alleged

that he was subjected to discrimination on the bases of disability and

age when on November 1, 1997, he became aware that two agency officials

delayed paperwork submitted for OWCP Claim which in turn delayed his

benefits and caused additional physical, mental and financial damage.

On November 7, 2001, the agency issued its final decision dismissing

complainant's complaint for failure to state a claim. Specifically,

the agency stated that complainant raised the same matters in his two

prior EEO complaints, Agency Nos. 4D-280-0225-97 and 4D-280-0032-98,

consolidated and decided by the agency in its July 22, 1998 FAD.

On appeal, complainant states �At the time of my complaint I suffered

from major depression and did not have an attorney, my complaint was done

without assistance and as best I could do at the time with my condition.�

In response, the agency argues that the instant complaint and Agency

Nos. 4D-280-0225-97 and 4D-280-0032-98 state the same underlying claim.

Further, the agency requests that we affirm its final decision.

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides that

the agency shall dismiss a complaint that states the same claim that is

pending before or has been decided by the agency or

Commission. Upon review, we find that the record establishes that the

delayed paperwork submitted for OWCP Claim was previously raised in

Agency Nos. 4D-280-0225-97 and 4D-280-0032-98. Therefore, the agency

correctly determined that the instant complaint states the same claim

as that decided by the agency. Accordingly, the agency's final decision

dismissing the complaint was proper and it is hereby AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

February 27, 2002

__________________

Date