Melissa L. Kimps, Complainant,v.Harvey L. Pitt, Chairman, Securities and Exchange Commission, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 6, 2002
01A20163_r (E.E.O.C. Dec. 6, 2002)

01A20163_r

12-06-2002

Melissa L. Kimps, Complainant, v. Harvey L. Pitt, Chairman, Securities and Exchange Commission, Agency.


Melissa L. Kimps v. Securities and Exchange Commission

01A20163

December 6, 2002

.

Melissa L. Kimps,

Complainant,

v.

Harvey L. Pitt,

Chairman,

Securities and Exchange Commission,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A20163

Agency No. 17-01

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the final

agency decision dated September 18, 2001, dismissing her complaint of

unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.,

Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act),

as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. , and the Age Discrimination in

Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.

In her formal complaint, filed on May 29, 2001, complainant alleged

that she was subjected to a hostile work environment on the bases of

sex, age, and disability since August 1998. Examples of a hostile work

environment included complainant's assertion that on December 10, 1999,

she had an encounter with her supervisor; on September 8, 2000, her

supervisor deemed complainant to be absent without leave, and caused an

"erosion" of her GS-11 duties.

The record reflects that on September 17, 2001, complainant filed an

amendment to her complaint, alleging that her supervisor discriminated

against her by giving her an unsatisfactory rating on her performance

evaluation for the rating period of May 1, 2000 through April 30, 2001,

and by denying her a within-grade increase.

In its September 18, 2001 decision, the agency dismissed the complaint

pursuant to EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(4) on the grounds

that complainant had raised the same claims in a negotiated grievance

procedure that permitted allegations of discrimination. Specifically,

the agency concluded that complainant's claims are the same or like

and related to her grievances filed on December 14, 1999, November 27,

2000 and December 7, 2000.

On appeal, complainant through her representative argues that the agency

erred in dismissing her complaint because the claims she raised previously

in the negotiated grievance process were never decided by the agency.

The representative further argues that complainant never made a true

election of the negotiated grievance procedure as a forum for any of her

grievances because the agency denied one of two grievances she filed on

December 7, 2000 grievance. Furthermore, the representative states that

complainant's September 17, 2001 amendment concerning her performance

rating constitutes a new issue.

In response, the agency argues that complainant's other grievances

were not affected by the rejection of a December 7, 2000 grievance as

non-grievable.<1> The agency determines that complainant elected to

pursue her harassment and hostile work environment claims through the

negotiated grievance procedure.

Further, the agency requests that the Commission remand two of

complainant's instant claims, concerning her failure to receive a

performance award for her work in the rating year 2000; and her August

2001 performance appraisal for rating year 2001 and a related denial of a

within-grade increase for further processing. The agency determines that

these two claims are not identical to those complainant pursued through

the negotiated grievance procedure. Finally, the agency requests that

the Commission affirm its dismissal of complainant's remaining claims

of harassment and hostile work environment.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.301(a) states that when a person is

employed by an agency subject to 5 U.S.C. � 7121(d) and is covered by a

collective bargaining agreement that permits claims of discrimination to

be raised in a negotiated grievance procedure, a person wishing to file a

complaint or grievance on a matter of alleged employment discrimination

must elect to raise the matter under either part 1614 or the negotiated

grievance procedure, but not both. An aggrieved employee who files

a grievance with an agency whose negotiated agreement permits the

acceptance of grievances which allege discrimination may not thereafter

file a complaint on the same matter under this part 1614 irrespective

of whether the agency has informed the individual of the need to elect

or whether the grievance has raised an issue of discrimination.

Pursuant to the agency's request in response to complainant's appeal, we

REVERSE the agency's dismissal of the two claims concerning complainant's

failure to receive a performance award for her work in the rating year

2000; and her August 2001 performance appraisal for rating year 2001,

along with a related denial of a within-grade increase. These claims

are REMANDED to the agency in accordance with the ORDER below.

Regarding the remaining claim, the record in the instant case contains a

copy of complainant's December 14, 1999, November 27, 2000, and December

7, 2000 grievances concerning her harassment and hostile work environment

claims. As part of the record, the agency submitted �Attachment 1" of

the MOU, which language does not expressly allow or prohibit the filing

of a grievance based on discrimination. Based on the broad definition

of what constitute a grievance, as well as the fact that grievances due

to discrimination are not expressly listed under Attachment 1 of the

MOU dealing with excepted grievance issues, we find that the grievances

filed by complainant does fall within the proscriptions outlined in 29

C.F.R. � 1614.301(a). See Hall v. Department of Agriculture, EEOC Appeal

No. 01996610 (March 7, 2001). Consequently, we find that by filing her

grievances which encompass the hostile work environment claim that is

raised in her formal complaint, complainant made an election of forum and

she cannot now file an EEO complaint in the EEO forum on the same matter.

In summary, the agency's decision to dismiss the claims regarding an

evaluation for the rating period of May 1, 2000 through April 30, 2001,

and the denial of a within-grade increase is REVERSED. Those claims are

REMANDED to the agency for further processing in accordance with the ORDER

below. The agency's decision to dismiss the remaining claim, relating

to a hostile work environment, is AFFIRMED for the reason stated herein.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0900)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar

days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after

one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your

complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until

such time as the agency issues its final decision on your complaint.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file

a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 6, 2002

__________________

Date

1The record reflects that in April 2001, one

of two grievances that complainant filed on December 7, 2000, regarding

her failure to receive performance awards, was denied on the grounds that

the amount of a performance award is not a grievable matter under the

negotiated grievance procedure. The other grievance filed on December 7,

2000, alleged that she had been harassed and mistreated since 1998.