Martha Casablanca, Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 8, 2001
01992067 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 8, 2001)

01992067

02-08-2001

Martha Casablanca, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Martha Casablanca v. United States Postal Service

01992067

February 8, 2001

.

Martha Casablanca,

Complainant,

v.

William J. Henderson,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01992067

Agency Nos. 1-F-946-1026-95

1-F-946-1033-96

1-F-946-1047-96

DECISION

Complainant settled her EEO complaints by agreement signed July 6, 1998.

On November 14, 1998, complainant claimed that the agency breached the

settlement agreement. On December 16, 1998, the agency found no breach.

Specifically, the agency noted that complainant already received a check

for compensatory damages, and that the paperwork for complainant's

back pay had been forwarded to the Minneapolis accounting office.

Complainant appealed.

The settlement agreement provided, in relevant part:

The Agency agrees to pay the complainant two years of back pay for the

period of June 11, 1996 to June 12, 1998, plus interest, with regular and

normal deductions, plus normal attendant job benefits for that period.

With respect to compensatory damages, the Agency has agreed to compensate

the Complainant with a lump sum in the amount of . . . $10,000.00,

with taxes to be the sole responsibility of the Complainant.

On appeal, complainant, through her attorney, admits receipt of the

check for compensatory damages, but contends that she has not received

the back pay with interest nor leave/benefit reimbursement. Complainant

claims that the accounting office had no record of a request to process

complainant's back pay award. The record includes a copy of the paperwork

allegedly sent to the accounting office to process complainant's back pay,

signed and dated August 13, 1998.

In the absence of explicit time frames, the terms of a settlement

agreement must be fulfilled within a reasonable time. See Garrison

v. Department of Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05950867 (Apr. 24, 1997)

(citing Gomez v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05930921

(Feb. 10, 1994)). The record reveals that the agency had not

paid complainant back pay some six months after agreeing to do so.

Although the record shows that the agency completed the paperwork

necessary for payment prior to complainant's claim of breach, neither

party has supplemented the record to indicate whether or when the back

pay and benefits were provided. Given the elapsed time without further

information, the Commission is unable to determine whether the agency

complied with the settlement within a reasonable time. On remand,

the agency must supplement the record with this information.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the agency's finding of no breach is VACATED, and the claim

is REMANDED for further processing.

ORDER

Within 30 days after the date this decision becomes final the agency

shall:

Supplement the record with evidence showing when complainant received

back pay with interest, as well as benefits, pursuant to the settlement

agreement.

Issue a new decision concerning whether it breached the July 6, 1998

settlement agreement.

A copy of the new decision must be sent to complainant, her attorney,

and the Compliance Officer as referenced herein.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0900)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order

prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29

C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively,

the complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action

for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. � 2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the

complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION

(R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

February 8, 2001

__________________

Date