Malden D. Smith, Complainant,v.Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Defense Finance & Accounting Service), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 19, 2006
01a61933 (E.E.O.C. May. 19, 2006)

01a61933

05-19-2006

Malden D. Smith, Complainant, v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Defense Finance & Accounting Service), Agency.


Malden D. Smith v. Department of Defense

01A61933

May 19, 2006

.

Malden D. Smith,

Complainant,

v.

Donald H. Rumsfeld,

Secretary,

Department of Defense,

(Defense Finance & Accounting Service),

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A61933

Agency No. DFAS-IN-AS-04-017

Hearing No. 310-2004-00424X

DISMISSAL OF APPEAL

Complainant filed an appeal with this Commission from the agency's

final action dated July 29, 2005, concerning his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination. EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.402 provides

that appeals to the Commission must be filed within 30 calendar

days after a complainant receives notice of the agency's decision.

Complainant received the agency's decision on August 2, 2005. However,

the appeal was postmarked January 21, 2006, which was beyond the thirty

(30) day time limit set by the regulations. The record reveals that the

agency's decision explicitly informed complainant of the time limits on

his right to appeal.

On appeal, complainant's non-attorney representative contends that

although complainant received the agency's decision on August 2, 2005,

she did not receive it. EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.605(d) provides

that when the complainant designates an attorney as representative,

service of all official correspondence shall be made on the attorney

and the complainant, but time frames for receipt of materials shall be

computed from the time of receipt by the attorney. Since complainant's

representative is not an attorney, the requisite time limit to file

complainant's appeal began from the date when complainant received the

agency's decision. Thus, the Commission finds that complainant fails

to provide adequate justification to invoke waiver or equitable tolling

for filing the appeal.

In addition, it appears that complainant's representative filed, via

facsimile, a request for an extension of time to file a statement or

brief in support of his appeal to the Commission which was granted.

This request was dated January 3, 2006. Even if this request was

considered as an appeal notice, it would still be untimely. Accordingly,

the appeal is DISMISSED as untimely pursuant to � 1614.403(c).

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

May 19, 2006

__________________

Date