05A40743_r
06-25-2004
Lee A. McDaniel, III, Complainant, v. Gordon R. England, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.
Lee A. McDaniel, III v. Department of the Navy
05A40743
June 25, 2004
.
Lee A. McDaniel, III,
Complainant,
v.
Gordon R. England,
Secretary,
Department of the Navy,
Agency.
Request No. 05A40743
Appeal No. 01A22232
Agency No. 01-63124-001
DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
Lee A. McDaniel, III (complainant) timely initiated a request to the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider
the decision in Lee A. McDaniel, III v. Department of the Navy, EEOC
Appeal No. 01A22232 (April 20, 2004). EEOC Regulations provide that the
Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission
decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate
decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact
or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on
the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. �
1614.405(b).
The Commission reminds complainant that a �request for reconsideration
is not a second appeal to the Commission.� Equal Employment Opportunity
Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (rev. Nov. 9, 1999), at 9-17.
Complainant did not submit a brief in support of his appeal and while his
request for reconsideration clearly expresses his dissatisfaction with the
appellate decision's finding, nothing in his request for reconsideration
establishes that the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous
interpretation of material fact or law. This Commission carefully
considered all of the record evidence at the time it rendered the initial
decision in question, and complainant has offered no persuasive reason
why this decision should be reconsidered now.
Therefore, after a review of complainant's request for reconsideration,
the previous decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that
the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and
it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision
in EEOC Appeal No. 01A22232 remains the Commission's final decision.
There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of
the Commission on this request for reconsideration.
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right
of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the
right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District
Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this
decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in
the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department
head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
_June 25, 2004_________________
Date