Lawrence L. Graff, Appellant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 23, 1998
05960406 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 23, 1998)

05960406

10-23-1998

Lawrence L. Graff, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Lawrence L. Graff v. United States Postal Service

05960406

October 23, 1998

Lawrence L. Graff, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Request No. 05960406

) Appeal No. 01943676

William J. Henderson, ) Agency No. 4-P-1001-92

Postmaster General, ) Hearing No. 210-92-4271X

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

___________________________________)

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

INTRODUCTION

On March 30, 1996, Lawrence L. Graff (appellant), timely initiated

a request to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to

reconsider the decision in Lawrence L. Graff v. USPS, EEOC Appeal

No. 01943676 (February 27, 1996). EEOC Regulations provide that

the Commissioners may, in their discretion, reconsider any previous

Commission decision. 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(a). The party requesting

reconsideration must submit written argument or evidence which tends to

establish one or more of the following three criteria: new and material

evidence is available that was not readily available when the previous

decision was issued, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(1); the previous decision

involved an erroneous interpretation of law, regulation or material fact,

or misapplication of established policy, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(2); and

the previous decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(3). Appellant's request

is denied.

After a review of appellant's request to reconsider, the previous

decision,<1> and the entire record, the Commission finds that appellant's

request fails to meet any of the criteria of 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c),

and it is the decision of the Commission to deny appellant's request.

The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01943676 (February 27, 1996) remains

the Commission's final decision, as modified above. There is no further

right of administrative appeal on a decision of the Commission on this

Request to Reconsider.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0993)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court.

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil action,

YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE

OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS

OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in

the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

Oct. 23, 1998

__________________ _______________________________

DATE Frances M. Hart

Executive Officer

Executive Secretariat

1The previous decision erred in citing to 29 C.F.R. �1614.203 with regard

to reassignment as a religious accommodation. That provision applies

only to claims of discrimination based on disability.