0120102994
11-23-2011
Kenneth L. Scott,
Complainant,
v.
Patrick R. Donahoe,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service
(Southwest Area),
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120102994
Agency No. 1G-758-0004-10
DECISION
Complainant filed an appeal with this Commission concerning his complaint
of unlawful employment discrimination. For the reasons set forth, we
AFFIRM the Agency’s decision, dismissing the complaint.
BACKGROUND
The record reveals that, during the relevant time, Complainant was
employed as a Mail Handler at the Agency’s East Texas Processing and
Distribution Center in Tyler, Texas. EEO Counselor’s Report at 1.
Complainant sought EEO counseling and subsequently filed a formal
complaint. Complainant alleged that he was subjected to discrimination
on the basis of reprisal for prior EEO activity when, on March 2, 2010,
he was issued a 7-Day Suspension for Unacceptable Conduct and Failure
to Follow Instructions. On June 17, 2010, the Agency issued a decision
dismissing the complaint as moot.
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(5) provides for
the dismissal of a complaint when the issues raised therein are moot.
To determine whether the issues raised in complainant’s complaint
are moot, the factfinder must ascertain whether (1) it can be said
with assurance that there is no reasonable expectation that the alleged
violation will recur; and (2) interim relief or events have completely
and irrevocably eradicated the effects of the alleged discrimination.
See County of Los Angeles v. Davis, 440 U.S. 625, 631 (1979); Kuo
v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Request No. 05970343 (July 10, 1998).
When such circumstances exist, no relief is available and no need for
a determination of the rights of the parties is presented.
Upon review, the Commission finds that Complainant's complaint was
properly dismissed as moot. Specifically, the record reveals that
the issue was resolved prior to the filing of Complainant’s formal
complaint when the suspension was reduced to a discussion during the
grievance procedure. Thus, there is no reasonable expectation that the
alleged action will recur, and the interim relief has completely and
irrevocably eradicated the effects of the alleged violation. We note
that Complainant has not requested compensatory damages.
CONCLUSION
The Agency’s final decision dismissing Complainant’s complaint
is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0610)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the
policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive
for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).
All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as
the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency
head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full
name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal
of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the
national organization, and not the local office, facility or department
in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a
civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative
processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that
the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also
permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other
security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,
42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,
29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within
the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with
the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.
Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits
as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File a Civil Action”).
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
November 23, 2011
__________________
Date
2
0120102994
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
2
0120102994