Kathleen Y. Jordan, Petitioner,v.Margaret Spellings, Secretary, Department of Education, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 29, 2007
0320070105 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 29, 2007)

0320070105

08-29-2007

Kathleen Y. Jordan, Petitioner, v. Margaret Spellings, Secretary, Department of Education, Agency.


Kathleen Y. Jordan,

Petitioner,

v.

Margaret Spellings,

Secretary,

Department of Education,

Agency.

Petition No. 0320070105

MSPB No. CH0432060192I2

DECISION

Petitioner filed a timely petition with the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission asking for review of a Final Order issued by the Merit

Systems Protection Board (MSPB) concerning her claim of discrimination

in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII),

as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Petitioner alleged that she was discriminated against on the basis of

reprisal for prior protected EEO activity under Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 when she was removed from her position of Equal

Opportunity Specialist, GS-11 for unacceptable performance.

A hearing was held and thereafter an MSPB Administrative Judge (AJ)

issued an initial decision finding the agency's appraisal plan was

approved by the Office of Personnel Management, petitioner's performance

standards were valid and communicated to her, that she was given a

reasonable opportunity to improve her performance, and that petitioner

failed to perform satisfactorily in a critical element of her position.

The AJ further found that petitioner did not support her claims of

retaliation. Petitioner sought review by the full Board, which denied

her request. Petitioner then filed the instant petition, arguing that

the agency was unwilling to engage in settlement negotiations following

the Initial Decision and which she argued exhibited bad faith.

EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission has jurisdiction over

mixed case appeals on which the MSPB has issued a decision that makes

determinations on allegations of discrimination. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.303

et seq. The Commission must determine whether the decision of the

MSPB with respect to the allegation of discrimination constitutes a

correct interpretation of any applicable law, rule, regulation or policy

directive, and is supported by the evidence in the record as a whole.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.305(c). The records indicate that petitioner did not

show that the agency's reasons for removing her were a pretext for

retaliation.

Based upon a thorough review of the record, it is the decision of

the Commission to concur with the final decision of the MSPB finding

no discrimination. The Commission finds that the MSPB's decision

constitutes a correct interpretation of the laws, rules, regulations,

and policies governing this matter and is supported by the evidence in

the record as a whole.

PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (W0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court,

based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date that you receive this decision.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 29, 2007

__________________

Date

2

0320070105

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036