0520120060
01-27-2012
Juanita A. Ignacio, Complainant, v. John M. McHugh, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.
Juanita A. Ignacio,
Complainant,
v.
John M. McHugh,
Secretary,
Department of the Army,
Agency.
Request No. 0520120060
Appeal No. 0120084019
Hearing No. 450-2008-0020X
Agency No. BHEFF09508F0FF0
DENIAL
Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in
Juanita A. Ignacio v. Department of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 0120084019
(September 21, 2011). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may,
in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission
decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate
decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact
or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on
the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. §
1614.405(b).
The facts and procedural background are set forth in the previous
decision and are incorporated herein by reference. In her request for
reconsideration, Complainant submitted many documents concerning the
merits of her complaint, but she did not make any specific arguments nor
did she present any specific evidence concerning the previous decision.
According to Complainant, “I am filing an appeal again . . . .”
After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the
Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of
29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission
to deny the request. We remind Complainant that a “request for
reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission.” Equal
Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614
(EEO MD-110) (rev. Nov. 9, 1999), at 9-17. A reconsideration request
is an opportunity to demonstrate that the previous decision involved
a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) will
have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the
Agency. Here, we find no evidence that Complainant has met the criteria
for reconsideration. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120084019 remains
the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative
appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.
COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right
of administrative appeal from the Commission’s decision. You have the
right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District
Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive
this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant
in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department
head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
“Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and
not the local office, facility or department in which you work.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that
the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also
permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other
security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,
42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,
29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within
the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with
the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.
Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits
as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File a Civil Action”).
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
___1/27/12_______________
Date
2
0520120060
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
2
0520120060