John E. Terenyi, Complainant,v.Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, Department of Transportation, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 14, 2002
05a20542 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 14, 2002)

05a20542

06-14-2002

John E. Terenyi, Complainant, v. Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, Department of Transportation, Agency.


John E. Terenyi v. Department of Transportation

05A20542

6/14/02

.

John E. Terenyi,

Complainant,

v.

Norman Y. Mineta,

Secretary,

Department of Transportation,

Agency.

Request No. 05A20542

Appeal No. 01A05190

Agency No. 1-97-1098

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

John E. Terenyi (complainant) timely initiated a request to the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider

the decision in John E. Terenyi v. Department of Transportation, EEOC

Appeal No. 01A05190 (February 13, 2002). EEOC Regulations provide that

the Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission

decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate

decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact

or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on

the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. �

1614.405(b).

On July 25, 1997, complainant filed a formal complaint alleging the

agency discriminated against him on the basis of religion (Baptist),

when it refused his request for a schedule change so that he could have

Sundays off in order to participate in religious services. After the

agency issued a final decision finding no discrimination, complainant

appealed. The prior decision found the agency offered complainant

several alternatives to his requested accommodation, but could not grant

him Sundays off. In light of the accommodations offered by the agency,

the prior decision found complainant had not shown the agency failed to

accommodate his religious beliefs.

In his request for reconsideration, complainant states that he is

presently in a position which allows him Sundays off from work. He states

he was granted a new schedule when a new union agreed to his request.

Complainant also states that increased staffing at his facility has

permitted him to have Sundays off from work. Complainant fears, however,

that this may change in the future.

After a review of complainant's request for reconsideration, the previous

decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request

fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the

decision of the Commission to deny the request. Complainant admits

that the agency granted his desired accommodation. Complainant failed

to establish that the prior decision involved a clearly erroneous

interpretation of material law or fact. The decision in EEOC Appeal

No. 01A05190 remains the Commission's final decision. There is no further

right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this

request for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

6/14/02

Date