Joan E. Freed, Complainant,v.Dr. Donald C. Winter, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 24, 2008
0120080951 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 24, 2008)

0120080951

04-24-2008

Joan E. Freed, Complainant, v. Dr. Donald C. Winter, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.


Joan E. Freed,

Complainant,

v.

Dr. Donald C. Winter,

Secretary,

Department of the Navy,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120080951

Agency No. 07-68335-02474

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from a final

agency decision dated November 2, 2007, dismissing her complaint of

unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and

the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29

U.S.C. � 621 et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's

complaint was improperly dismissed for failure to state a claim.

During the relevant period, complainant was employed as a Quality

Assurance Specialist at a New Jersey facility of the agency. On July

19, 2007, complainant initiated contact with an EEO Counselor alleging

that the agency subjected her to hostile work environment harassment

on the bases of sex (female) and age (over 40) when, that day, a

Supervisory Engineer (who was not in complainant's supervisory chain)

(S1) accused her of taking someone else's keys, chased her for the

keys, seemed to attempt to grab complainant's arm, and told her that she

could not leave the room. In a formal complaint dated October 11, 2007,

complainant alleged that S1 subjected her to a hostile work environment

and, to support her claim, detailed various incidents between April 2005

and 2007. Complainant alleged that S1 verbally attacked her regarding

a lawsuit, bypassed her work inspections, watched her and listened to

her conversations, belittled her work, and attempted to blame her for

the actions of his subordinate. Complainant stated that she contacted

an EEO Counselor regarding the prior incidents previously.

In its November 2 final decision, the agency dismissed complainant's

complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state

a claim. The agency stated that complainant failed to allege conduct that

is sufficiently severe or pervasive to create a hostile work environment.

The agency identified the July 19 incident only.

The instant appeal from complainant followed. On appeal, complainant

stated that the July 19 incident is not the only harassing incident

although the agency characterized it as such; and that she informed an

EEO Counselor of S1's harassing incidents in February or March 2007

and on March 21, 2007, April 6, 2007, August 3, 2007, August 6, 2007

and August 31, 2007. Further, complainant stated that she also alleged

reprisal for prior EEO activity as a basis. Finally, she added that S1

attempted to assault her.

EEOC regulations require the dismissal of complaints that fail to state a

claim. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). To state a claim, a complainant

must allege harm to a term, condition, or privilege of employment

for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force,

EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). Hostile work environment

harassment is actionable if it is sufficiently severe or pervasive to

alter the conditions of complainant's employment. See Harris v. Forklift

Systems, Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 21 (1993).

The Commission determines that taking all complainant's allegation

together, and assuming them to be true, she has alleged a viable claim of

harassment/hostile work environment. Moreover, we find that complainant

asserts the basis of reprisal for prior EEO activity and that the agency

actions alleged were of a type reasonably likely to deter complainant

or others from engaging in protected activity. As such, we find that

complainant has stated a claim of harassment based on reprisal. We note

that the incidents that were not raised in the counseling for the instant

complaint but that were alleged in the instant formal complaint should

be used as evidence in support of the harassment claim.

Accordingly, we REVERSE the final agency decision dismissing complainant's

complaint and REMAND the harassment claim consistent with this decision

and the Order below.

ORDER

The agency is ordered to process the remanded hostile work environment

harassment claim in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108 et seq.

The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant that it has received

the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this

decision becomes final. The agency shall issue to complainant a copy

of the investigative file and also shall notify complainant of the

appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the

date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved

prior to that time. If the complainant requests a final decision without

a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60)

days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

April 24, 2008

__________________

Date

2

0120080951

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

5

0120080951