Iris D.,1 Complainant,v.Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Pacific Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 1, 2015
0120151745 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 1, 2015)

0120151745

10-01-2015

Iris D.,1 Complainant, v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Pacific Area), Agency.


U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

Iris D.,1

Complainant,

v.

Megan J. Brennan,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service

(Pacific Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120151745

Agency No. 4F913001915

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated March 27, 2015, dismissing her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Supervisor, Customer Service at the Agency's Post Office facility in Woodland Hills, California.

On February 28, 2015, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected her to discrimination on the bases of sex (female), disability, age, and reprisal for prior protected EEO activity when: (1) on October 29, 2014, she was forced to resign;2 (2) on December 22, 2014, she was issued a notice of removal and subsequently, on January 23, 2015, she was issued a Letter of Decision upholding the proposed removal.

The Agency dismissed the complaint because Complainant filed an appeal with the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) on November 26, 2014, alleging that she was coerced into resigning. On February 2, 2015 she filed another appeal with the MSPB related to the Letter of Decision upholding the removal. Complainant's formal EEO complaint was filed after her MSPB appeals.

The instant appeal from Complainant followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

A mixed case complaint is a complaint of employment discrimination filed with a federal agency, related to or stemming from an action that can be appealed to the MSPB. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.302(a)(1). An aggrieved person may initially file a mixed case complaint with an agency or may file a mixed case appeal directly with the MSPB, pursuant to 5 C.F.R. � 1201.151, but not both. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.302(b). 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(4) provides that an agency shall dismiss a complaint where the complainant has raised the matter in an appeal to the MSPB and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.302 indicates that a complainant has elected to pursue the non - EEO process.

We find that Complainant opted to pursue the matters before the MSPB. As such, the Agency properly dismissed her EEO complaint.

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0815)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at Chap. 9 � VII.B (Aug. 5, 2015). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)

If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the

time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainants Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden's signature

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 1, 2015

__________________

Date

1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant's name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission's website.

2 It appears from the record that Complainant was to be returned as a Postal Support Employee.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

0120151745

2

0120151745