Houpt et al.v.Allwein et al.

Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences

Feb 24, 2009

11167366 (B.P.A.I. Feb. 24, 2009)

1
BoxInterferences@uspto.gov Paper 138 1
Tel: 571-272-9797 Filed: 24 February 2009 2
3
4
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 5
_______________ 6
7
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS 8
AND INTERFERENCES 9
_______________ 10
RONALD A. HOUPT, CARL J. KISSELL, 11
CAMERON J. WRIGHT, and JON W. PEREIRA 12
Junior Party 13
(Patent 6,960,276), 14
15
v. 16
17
ROBERT J. ALLWEIN and LARRY J. WEINSTEIN 18
Senior Party 19
(Application 11/167,366). 20
_____________ 21
22
Patent Interference No. 105,603 (SCM) 23
(Technology Center 1700) 24
25
Before JAMESON LEE, SALLY GARDNER LANE, and SALLY C. MEDLEY, 26
Administrative Patent Judges. 27
28
MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge. 29
Judgment 30
Upon consideration of the “Decision – Motions – Bd.R. 125(b)” (Paper 31
137), and for the reasons given therein, it is 32
ORDERED that judgment be entered against Senior Party ALLWEIN 33
for count 1 (Paper 1, page 4); 34
2
FURTHER ORDERED that claims 106-119 of Senior Party 1
ALLWEIN’s involved application are FINALLY REFUSED, 35 U.S.C. 135(a); 2
and 3
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be entered in 4
the administrative records of the involved ALLWEIN application and HOUPT 5
patent. 6
7
8
9
10
11
cc (via electronic mail): 12
13
Attorney for Houpt: 14
15
Email: Richard.lazarus@btlaw.com 16
Email: Jeffrey.karceski@btlaw.com 17
18
Attorney for Allwein: 19
20
Email: swparmelee@townsend.com 21
Email: mdbarrish@townsend.com 22
Email: djgibby@townsend.com 23