Hisham Khaleel Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (New York Metro Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 22, 2005
05a51110 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 22, 2005)

05a51110

08-22-2005

Hisham Khaleel Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (New York Metro Area), Agency.


Hishan Kahleel v. United States Postal Service

05A51110

08-22-05

.

Hisham Khaleel

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service

(New York Metro Area),

Agency.

Request No. 05A51110

Appeal No. 01A52276

Agency No. 4 110 0169 04

DENIAL

Hisham Khaleel (complainant) timely requested reconsideration of

the decision in Hisham Khaleel v. United States Postal Serv., EEOC

Appeal No. 01A52276 (June 23, 2005). EEOC Regulations provide that

the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any

previous Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that:

(1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a

substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the

agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

The Commission dismissed complainant's appeal in Khaleel v. United

States Postal Serv., EEOC Appeal No. 01A52276 (June 23, 2005), for

failure to contact an EEO Counselor within forty-five days of the

alleged discriminatory incident pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2).

The Commission found that complainant failed to offer any justification

for his delay in contacting an EEO counselor in a timely manner.

In his request for reconsideration, complainant states, in relevant

part, that during that time period, he had to handle multiple issues

including combating his eviction, and attending orientation at the agency.

After reconsidering the previous decision and the entire record, the

Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny

the request. Complainant has failed to offer any compelling reasons

to justify not contacting EEO Counselor within 45 days. The decision

in EEOC Appeal No. 01A52268 remains the Commission's final decision.

There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of

the Commission on this request.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this

decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

____08-22-05______________

Date