Gwendolyn H. King, Complainant,v.John Truesdale, Chairman, National Labor Relations Board, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 10, 2001
05990980 (E.E.O.C. May. 10, 2001)

05990980

05-10-2001

Gwendolyn H. King, Complainant, v. John Truesdale, Chairman, National Labor Relations Board, Agency.


Gwendolyn H. King v. National Labor Relations Board

05990980

May 10, 2001

.

Gwendolyn H. King,

Complainant,

v.

John Truesdale,

Chairman,

National Labor Relations Board,

Agency.

Request No. 05990980

Appeal No. 01976292

Agency Nos. MEM: 95-01; 02; 05; 08; 09; 10

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

The complainant initiated a request to the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission to reconsider the decision in Gwendolyn H. King v. National

Labor Relations Board, EEOC Appeal No. 01976292 (July 13, 1999).

EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion,

reconsider any previous Commission decision where the requesting party

demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous

interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision

will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations

of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

In her formal complaints, complainant alleged she was discriminated

against on the bases of race (Black), sex (female) and in reprisal for

prior protected activity arising under Title VII regarding discipline

because of time and attendance, her performance appraisals, and the denial

of a within grade increase. The appellate decision affirmed the agency's

finding of no discrimination. In her request for reconsideration,

complainant has not presented any evidence or argument that was not

previously considered by the Commission when we affirmed the agency's

final decision.

After a review of the complainant's request for reconsideration, the

previous decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that the

request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it

is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision

in EEOC Appeal No. 01976292 remains the Commission's final decision.

There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of

the Commission on this request for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

May 10, 2001

__________________

Date