Gwendolyn Applewhaite, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 19, 2004
01A33941_r (E.E.O.C. Feb. 19, 2004)

01A33941_r

02-19-2004

Gwendolyn Applewhaite, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Gwendolyn Applewhaite v. United States Postal Service

01A33941

February 19, 2004

.

Gwendolyn Applewhaite,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A33941

Agency No. 4H-327-0004-03

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the final

agency decision dated May 14, 2003, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

In her formal complaint, filed on January 14, 2003, complainant

alleged that she was subjected to discrimination on the bases of race

(African-American), sex (female), and in reprisal for prior EEO activity.

In its final decision, the agency determined that complainant's complaint

was comprised of the following three claims<1>:

(1) complainant was not awarded a position in South Florida;

(2) she was incorrectly paid for Pay Period 16, week 2 and Pay Period

17, week 1; and

(3) on September 9, 2002, she was directed to report to the Riviera

Beach office.

The agency dismissed claims (1) - (3) on the grounds that they state

the same claims that had been raised in previously filed EEO complaints.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. 1614.107(a)(1) provides in part that the

agency shall dismiss a complaint that states the same claim that is

pending before or has been decided by the agency or

Commission.

Claim (1)

Regarding claim (1), the record reveals that complainant previously

filed a formal EEO complaint on January 14, 2003, concerning her not

being awarded a position in South Florida District, identified as

Agency Case No. 4H-327-0035-03. The Commission determines that claim

(1) was properly dismissed for stating the same claim that is pending

before or has been previously decided by the agency or Commission.

Claim (2)

Regarding claim (2), the record reveals that complainant filed a formal

EEO complaint on October 22, 2002, concerning being incorrectly paid for

Pay Period 16, week 2 and Pay Period 17, week 1, which was identified

Agency No. 4H-327-0211-02. Therefore, we find that the agency properly

dismissed claim (2).

Claim (3)

Regarding claim (3), we determine that the matters raised in the

prior complaint (Agency No. 4H-327-0027-03) and the incident raised

in instant complaint are not identical. The record reflects that in

Agency No. 4H-327-0027-03, the agency accepted the following claims for

investigation: after being placed in her regular position as Manager,

Customer Service, in Riviera Beach, complainant (a) was not allowed to

participate in Manager's meetings in September 2002; (b) on September 23,

2002, her supervisor staffing was changed; and (c) from September 30, 2002

through October 19, 2002, her office was overly scrutinized with several

reviews and audits, and she was verbally abused by an agency Postmaster.

In contrast, claim (3) of the instant complaint addresses the issue

that on September 9, 2002, complainant was directed by MSCO to report

to her Riviera Beach office as a Level 16 Supervisor with the work hours

of 10:00-17:00.

It has long been established that "identical" does not mean "similar."

The Commission has consistently held that in order for a complaint

to be dismissed as identical, the elements of the complaint must

be identical to the elements of the prior complaint in time, place,

incident, and parties. See Jackson v. Department of the Air Force,

EEOC Appeal No. 01955890 (April 5, 1996). The matters raised in Agency

4H-327-0027-03 do not address the identical issue as raised in claim (3)

of the instant complaint. Therefore, we find that the agency improperly

dismissed claim (3).

Accordingly, the agency's decision to dismiss claims (1) and (2) is

AFFIRMED. The agency's decision to dismiss claim (3) is hereby REVERSED.

Claim (3) is REMANDED to the agency for further processing in accordance

with this decision and the Order below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claim (claim (3)) in

accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to

the complainant that it has received the remanded claim within thirty (30)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall

issue to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall

notify complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty

(150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the

matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant

requests a final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a

final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0900)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar

days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after

one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your

complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until

such time as the agency issues its final decision on your complaint.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file

a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

February 19, 2004

__________________

Date

1For purposes of clarity, the Commission has

numbered complainant's claims as claims (1)-(3).