Gregory Mitchell, Complainant,v.Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 12, 2001
07A00016 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 12, 2001)

07A00016

04-12-2001

Gregory Mitchell, Complainant, v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Gregory Mitchell v. Department of Veterans Affairs

Appeal No. 07A00016

04-12-01

.

Gregory Mitchell,

Complainant,

v.

Anthony J. Principi,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 07A00016.

Agency No. 98-0826.

Hearing No. 280-99-4041X

DECISION

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts the agency's

appeal from the decision of the Administrative Judge (AJ) in the

above-entitled matter.<1> Complainant filed a complaint in which he

claimed that the agency discriminated against him on the bases of race

(black), religion (Islam) and reprisal by allowing him to be subjected to

harassment by a subordinate. The agency investigated the complaint and

thereafter referred it to an AJ, who issued findings and conclusions in

complainant's favor and ordered relief. Element (2) of the AJ's order

for relief directed the agency to:

A. Issue a letter of reprimand to [the subordinate] admonishing him

for engaging in unlawful racial and religious harassment directed to

complainant; and

Require [the subordinate] to attend sensitivity training on racial and

religious diversity as a condition of his continued employment.

In its final order, the agency agreed with the AJ's findings and

conclusions on the merits. It also agreed to implement the relief

ordered by the AJ, with the exception of element (2). Specifically,

the agency stated:

We disagree with and reject so much of the [AJ's] decision as provides

for the issuance of a letter of reprimand to [the subordinate] and that

individual's attendance in sensitivity training as a condition of his

continued employment with the agency on the grounds that it exceeds

the authorized elements of relief that can be granted by the Commission

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.501(a).

Commission regulations state that each agency shall take appropriate

disciplinary action against employees who engage in discriminatory

practices. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.102(a)(6). In promulgating this policy,

the Commission clearly stated that it could not discipline or order the

discipline of employees directly. 52 Fed. Reg. 41920, 41921 (October

30, 1987). Rather, the Commission stated that the requirement of

corrective, curative, or preventative action permits the Commission to

recommend that disciplinary action be considered by the agency. Id. The

Commission reaffirmed this policy in Cassida v. Department of the Army,

EEOC Request No. 05900794 (September 14, 1990), in which it stated that it

could not order an agency to take disciplinary action against a particular

individual, but could order the agency to consider taking disciplinary

action under appropriate circumstances. The implementation of 29

C.F.R. Part 1614 in 1992, and the implementation of the amendments to

Part 1614 in 1999 have not altered the Commission's policy in this regard.

To the extent that element (2) of the AJ's order for relief orders the

agency to take a particular disciplinary action against an individual

employee, that order is inconsistent with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.102(a)(6).

A letter of reprimand is clearly a disciplinary action. The Commission

declines to order the agency to make attendance in the �sensitivity

training� a condition of continued employment with the agency. It is the

agency's responsibility to determine what discipline, if any, should be

imposed if the subordinate employee does not obey its directive. However,

the agency must consider the Commission's recommendation of discipline

and report its decision on whether to discipline to the Commission.

After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration

of all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission to AFFIRM the agency's final order.

Regarding element (2), we will modify that portion of the AJ's order so

that the agency will be directed to consider taking disciplinary action

against the subordinate employee responsible for the unlawful harassment.

Similarly, we will order the agency to require the subordinate to attend

sensitivity training, but we will not require the agency to condition the

subordinate's continued employment upon attendance at that training.

The agency will be directed to implement the relief specified in our

order below, and will also be directed to issue a report of compliance.

ORDER (D1199)

To the extent that it has not already done so, the agency shall take the

following remedial action within 60 days of the date that this decision

becomes final:

draft and implement a revised EEO policy statement which addresses and

prohibits not only sexual harassment, but also harassment based upon race,

color, national origin, religion, disability, age, and prior protected

EEO activity.

Consider taking disciplinary action against the subordinate employee

identified as being responsible for the discriminatory harassment

perpetrated against complainant. The agency shall report its decision.

If the agency decides to take disciplinary action, it shall identify the

action taken. If the agency decides not to take disciplinary action, it

shall set forth the reason(s) for its decision not to impose discipline.

Require the subordinate employee to attend sensitivity training on racial

and religious diversity.

Conduct a training session with all management employees at the John

Cochran Medical Facility which introduces them to the revised EEO policy

statement referenced in item (1) of this order, and which instructs

them on the appropriate methods of handling complaints of discriminatory

harassment in the workplace.

Award complainant compensatory damages in the amount of $1000.00

Reimburse complainant for any costs incurred in the handling of the

instant complaint, or alternatively, provide documentary proof that it had

done so, in accordance with item (5) of the Administrative Judge's order

for relief, set forth on page 46 of the Administrative Judge's decision

dated January 4, 2000. The agency shall determine the appropriate

amount due complainant, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.501, no later than

sixty (60) calendar days after the date this decision becomes final.

The complainant shall cooperate in the agency's efforts to compute the

amount due, and shall provide all relevant information requested by

the agency. If there is a dispute regarding the exact amount due, the

agency shall issue a check to the complainant for the undisputed amount

within sixty (60) calendar days of the date the agency determines the

amount it believes to be due.

The agency is further directed to submit a report of compliance, as

provided in the statement entitled "Implementation of the Commission's

Decision." The report shall include supporting documentation of the

agency's calculation of benefits due complainant, including evidence

that the corrective action has been implemented. The complainant may

petition for enforcement or clarification of the amount in dispute.

The petition for clarification or enforcement must be filed with the

Compliance Officer, at the address referenced in the statement entitled

"Implementation of the Commission's Decision."

ATTORNEY'S FEES (H0900)

If complainant has been represented by an attorney (as defined by

29 C.F.R. � 1614.501(e)(1)(iii), he/she is entitled to an award of

reasonable attorney's fees incurred in the processing of the complaint.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.501(e). The award of attorney's fees shall be paid

by the agency. The attorney shall submit a verified statement of fees

to the agency -- not to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,

Office of Federal Operations -- within thirty (30) calendar days of this

decision becoming final. The agency shall then process the claim for

attorney's fees in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.501.

POSTING ORDER (G1092)

The agency is ORDERED to post at the John Cochran Medical Center copies

of the attached notice. Copies of the notice, after being signed by the

agency's duly authorized representative, shall be posted by the agency

within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final,

and shall remain posted for sixty (60) consecutive days, in conspicuous

places, including all places where notices to employees are customarily

posted. The agency shall take reasonable steps to ensure that said

notices are not altered, defaced, or covered by any other material.

The original signed notice is to be submitted to the Compliance Officer

at the address cited in the paragraph entitled "Implementation of the

Commission's Decision," within ten (10) calendar days of the expiration

of the posting period.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1199)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the

complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order,

the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a

civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior

to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659-60 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408), and 29 C.F.R. �

1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a

civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph

below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407

and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the

underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �

2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999)

(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409).

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Frances M. Hart

Executive Officer

Executive Secretariat

___04-12-01_______________

Date

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days after it was mailed. I certify

that this decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

__________________

Date

______________________________

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply

to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the

administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the

revised regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 in deciding the present

appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the Commission's

website at www.eeoc.gov.