Gereka M. Custis, Complainant,v.Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJan 15, 2002
01a14567 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 15, 2002)

01a14567

01-15-2002

Gereka M. Custis, Complainant, v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense, Agency.


Gereka M. Custis v. Department of Defense

01A14567

January 15, 2002

.

Gereka M. Custis,

Complainant,

v.

Donald H. Rumsfeld,

Secretary,

Department of Defense,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A14567

Agency No. CLNORF01001

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the complaint was properly

dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO

Counselor contact.

Complainant sought EEO counseling on March 9, 2001, claiming that she

had been discriminated against when on January 3, 2001, (1) her desk was

moved without prior notice; (2) her supervisor yelled at her and pounded

on a desk; and (3) she was denied a performance award. Subsequently,

complainant filed a formal complaint on the bases of disability and in

reprisal for prior protected activity, regarding the matters for which

she underwent EEO counseling, discussed above. Complainant stated that

�mentally, [she was] not able to go through the EEO process [because

she was in] no condition to think clearly and [her] condition was not

getting better�.

The agency issued a final decision dismissing the complaint for untimely

EEO Counselor contact after finding that complainant had sought EEO

counseling �19 days beyond the 45-day time frame�.

On appeal, complainant contends that she was unaware of the 45-day time

limit and that she was never advised by the Human Resources office to seek

EEO counseling, even though she sought their assistance. In response,

the agency contends that complainant had access to the electronic

bulletin board where the agency disseminates its EEO policy with the

pertinent time limitations. The agency further contends that posted on

all official bulletin boards are EEO posters with the applicable time

limits, and submits copies of the EEO posters.

The record discloses that the alleged discriminatory event occurred on

January 3, 2001, but that complainant did not initiate contact with

an EEO Counselor until March 9, 2001, which is beyond the forty-five

(45) day limitation period. On appeal, no persuasive arguments or

evidence have been presented to warrant an extension of the time limit

for initiating EEO contact. Accordingly, the agency's final decision

dismissing the complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

January 15, 2002

Date