03A40144
11-03-2004
Frank J. Tate IV, Petitioner, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
Frank J. Tate IV v. United States Postal Service
03A40144
November 3, 2004
.
Frank J. Tate IV,
Petitioner,
v.
John E. Potter,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
Agency.
Petition No. 03A40144
MSPB No. AT-0752-03-0889-I-1
DECISION
On September 8, 2004, petitioner filed a timely petition with the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission asking for review of a Final Order
issued by the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) concerning his claim
of discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.
Petitioner, a Supervisor, Distribution Operations at an agency's facility
in Pembroke Pines, Florida, alleged that he was discriminated against on
the basis of disability (Krohn's disease) when he was placed on enforced
leave effective September 6, 2003.
On September 2, 2003, petitioner filed a mixed case appeal with the MSPB.
After a hearing, the Administrative Judge found that petitioner failed
to establish his claim of discrimination on the basis of disability.
The Board denied petitioner's petition for review.
EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission has jurisdiction over
mixed case appeals on which the MSPB has issued a decision that makes
determinations on allegations of discrimination. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.303
et seq. The Commission must determine whether the decision of the
MSPB with respect to the allegation of discrimination constitutes a
correct interpretation of any applicable law, rule, regulation or policy
directive, and is supported by the evidence in the record as a whole.
29 C.F.R. � 1614.305(c).
Based upon a thorough review of the record and for the foregoing reasons,
it is the decision of the Commission to concur with the final decision
of the MSPB finding no discrimination.<1> The Commission finds that
the MSPB's decision constitutes a correct interpretation of the laws,
rules, regulations, and policies governing this matter and is supported
by the evidence in the record as a whole.
PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (W0900)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of
administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right
to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court,
based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within
thirty (30) calendar days of the date that you receive this decision.
If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the
complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,
identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
November 3, 2004
__________________
Date
1For the purposes of analysis, we assume petitioner is an individual
with a disability.