Francis Susie Jr., Complainant,v.Gregory R. Dahlberg, Acting Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 30, 2001
05991000 (E.E.O.C. May. 30, 2001)

05991000

05-30-2001

Francis Susie Jr., Complainant, v. Gregory R. Dahlberg, Acting Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.


Francis Susie Jr. v. Department of the Army

05991000

May 30, 2001

.

Francis Susie Jr.,

Complainant,

v.

Gregory R. Dahlberg,

Acting Secretary,

Department of the Army,

Agency.

Request No. 05991000

Appeal No. 01975588

Agency No. 9403E0060; 9706H0060

Hearing No. 100-95-7433X; 100-95-7434X

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

The complainant initiated a request to the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider the decision in Francis

Susie Jr. v. Department of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 01975588 (July

2, 1999). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its

discretion, reconsider any previous Commission decision where the

requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved

a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2)

the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

In the underlying complaint, complainant contended that he was

discriminated against based on his age (52) and in reprisal for prior

EEO activity<1> when his supervisor: (1) threatened to fire him in a

profane manner after complainant stated that he was filing a grievance;

(2) made defaming and derogatory statements in several counseling letters;

(3) failed to forward telephone messages to complainant; (4) assigned

complainant to an extended Temporary Duty assignment with only two days

notice; and (5) created a hostile work environment. Following a hearing,

an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) found complainant failed to establish

a prima facie case of harassment based on either age or reprisal, and

the AJ's finding of no discrimination was adopted in the final agency

decision, which was affirmed by this Commission in the prior decision

In his request for reconsideration, complainant contends that he has

new and material evidence based on his subsequent removal from federal

service, and the finding of an EEOC Administrative Judge in another

case that complainant's supervisor retaliated against a co-worker who

testified on complainant's behalf at the hearing in the instant case.

After a review of the complainant's request for reconsideration, the

previous decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that the

request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it

is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision

in EEOC Appeal No. 01975588 remains the Commission's final decision.

There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of

the Commission on this request for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

May 30, 2001

__________________

Date

1The record indicates that complainant participated in prior protected

activity, but it is unclear under which statute such activity occurred.