Florestine George, Appellant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Pacific/Western Region) Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 31, 1999
01972797 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 31, 1999)

01972797

08-31-1999

Florestine George, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Pacific/Western Region) Agency.


Florestine George, )

Appellant, )

) Appeal No. 01972797

v. ) Agency No. 1F-901-1136-96

)

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

(Pacific/Western Region) )

Agency. )

)

)

DECISION

Appellant timely initiated an appeal of a final agency decision (FAD)

concerning her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination on the

bases of race (African), color (Brown), and sex (Female), in violation of

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e

et seq. Appellant alleges she was discriminated against on February 28,

1996, when she was denied a schedule change. The appeal is accepted

in accordance with EEOC Order No. 960.001. For the following reasons,

the agency's decision is VACATED AND REMANDED.

The record reveals that during the relevant time, appellant was employed

as a Clerk in Los Angeles. Appellant alleged that she was not allowed

to change her days off so that she could car pool. She alleged that

employees not of her protected groups were allowed to take details so

that they could car pool. Believing she was a victim of discrimination,

appellant sought EEO counseling and, subsequently, filed a complaint on

May 31, 1996. At the conclusion of the investigation, appellant did not

choose either a FAD or a hearing, so the agency issued a FAD.

The FAD concluded that appellant failed to establish a prima facie case

of race, color or sex discrimination because she presented no evidence

that similarly situated individuals not in her protected classes were

treated differently under similar circumstances.

Following a thorough review of the record on appeal, the Commission

concludes that appellant's allegations have not been adequately

investigated to permit the Commission to render a decision on the merits

of her complaint. In this regard, EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108(b)

provides that the agency shall develop a complete and impartial factual

record upon which to make findings on the matters raised in the written

complaint.

Based on a review of the record, the Commission finds that the agency

failed to provide any witness or management testimony. We also find that

the agency failed to ascertain the reason for denying the appellant's

request. Further, there is no documentary evidence of how comparable

employees were treated by the agency in terms of schedule changes for

car pooling or details granted to accommodate car pooling.

Therefore, the agency's decision is VACATED and the complaint is REMANDED

for a supplemental investigation, in accordance with the Order below.

ORDER

The agency is ORDERED to conduct a supplemental investigation within

120 days of the date this decision becomes final, which shall include

the following actions:

1) The agency shall ensure that responsible agency officials, appellant's

witnesses and any necessary comparison employees provide affidavits

addressing appellant's allegations that others were allowed to change

their schedules or take details in order to car pool. The agency is

to determine the specific reason why appellant was denied a schedule

change in order to car pool and is to determine whether a schedule

change has been approved for car pooling. The agency is to provide

comparison information regarding the race, color, and sex of those who

have changed their hours in order to car pool. The agency shall insure

that the investigator obtains all relevant information and procedures

for changing ones day off. The agency is also to provide any policies

or procedures regarding car pooling.

2) The agency shall provide appellant (30) days for the opportunity

to respond by affidavit and submit additional evidence for the record

that she deems relevant to the supplemental investigation. After the

record has been supplemented in accordance with this ORDER, the agency

shall provide appellant with a copy of the supplemental investigation

report, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.108(f), and thereafter issue a new

FAD within thirty (30) calendar days of appellant's response or, if

appellant fails to respond, within thirty (30) calendar days following

the last day appellant would have been permitted to respond. Copies of

the completed supplemental investigation and new FAD must be submitted

to the Compliance Officer, as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The

agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report

shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503(a). The appellant also has the right to

file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order

prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. ��1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503(g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. ��1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to

the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the

appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in the

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court. It is the position of the Commission that you

have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. You should be aware, however, that courts in some

jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner

suggesting that a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your

civil action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN

THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision

or to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the

jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. In the alternative,

you may file a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR

DAYS of the date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your

appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME

AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY

HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME

AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of

your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The

grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court.

Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time in which to

file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be

filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right

to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

August 31, 1999

DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations