Elmer C.,1 Complainant,v.Elaine L. Chao, Secretary, Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration), Agency.Download PDFEqual Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 7, 20192019003626 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 7, 2019) Copy Citation U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Federal Operations P.O. Box 77960 Washington, DC 20013 Elmer C.,1 Complainant, v. Elaine L. Chao, Secretary, Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration), Agency. Request No. 2019003626 Appeal No. 0120150721 Hearing No. 410-2012-00391X Agency No. 201124166FAA03 DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION The Agency requested that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) reconsider its decision in EEOC Appeal No. 2019003626 (February 15, 2018). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision issued pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(a), where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(b). By regulation, requests must be filed within thirty (30) calendar days after the party receives the previous decision. 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(b). A document is timely if it is received or postmarked before the expiration of the applicable filing period or, in the absence of a legible postmark, if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(b). 1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant’s name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website. 2019003626 2 Here, the Commission’s previous decision included a Certificate of Mailing indicating that, for purposes of timeliness, we will presume that the decision was received within five (5) calendar days of the date on which it was mailed, which was February 15, 2018. As such, the Agency is presumed to have received the previous decision no later than February 20, 2018. Thirty days from that date is March 22, 2018. However, the Agency submitted its request on April 5, 2018, which was beyond the 30-day limit set by regulation. In response to Complainant’s arguments that the request was untimely made, the Agency, in its brief, concedes that the decision was received by its Office of Civil Rights on February 22, 2018, and forwarded by email to its General Counsel’s office on February 23, 2018. However, the brief indicates the date of receipt was misread as February 28, 2018, and the five-day presumption was erroneously calculated from that date. After careful consideration of the Agency’s representations, we do not find the Agency’s reasons for its delay sufficient to waive it untimely filing. For the foregoing reasons, the Agency's request for reconsideration is denied. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120150721 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request. The Agency is directed to comply with our original Order as set forth below. ORDER The Agency is Ordered as follows: 1. The Agency is directed to submit a copy of the complaint file to the EEOC Atlanta District Office Hearings Unit (including the transcript of the second day of the hearing that has already taken place) within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date this decision is issued. The Agency shall provide written notification to the EEOC Compliance Officer at the address set forth below that the complaint file has been transmitted to the Hearings Unit. Thereafter, the Administrative Judge shall permit time for discovery and hold a supplemental hearing with respect to the “Race Memo.” Within 120 calendar days of the date this decision is issued, the AJ shall issue a new decision with respect to all four claims (including both alleged bases) raised in Agency No. 2011-24166-FAA-03 in accordance with 29 C.F.R. § 1614.109. Thereafter, the Agency shall issue a new final action in accordance with 29 C.F.R. § 1614.110. 2. The Agency has fifteen (15) calendar days to provide clear evidence to the Compliance Officer that both the Agency and the Atlanta District Office, Hearings Unit properly processed the following complaints: (1) Agency Mo. 2012-243- FAA03/EEOC Hearing No. 410-2013-00017X; (2) Agency No. 2012-24586-FAA- 03/EEOC Hearing No. 410-2013-00258X; and (3) Agency Mo. 2013-25011-FAA- 03/EEOC Hearing No. 410-2014-00062X. To the extent that clear evidence is not presented within fifteen (15) calendar days from the date this decision is issued, the 2019003626 3 Agency shall resume proper processing of Complainant’s complaints by submitting a copy of each complaint file to the Atlanta District Office Hearings Unit to be processed in accordance with 29 C.F.R. § 1614.109, and thereafter the Agency shall issue a final decision in accordance with 29 C.F.R. § 1614.110. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION’S DECISION (K0618) Under 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c) and § 1614.502, compliance with the Commission’s corrective action is mandatory. Within seven (7) calendar days of the completion of each ordered corrective action, the Agency shall submit via the Federal Sector EEO Portal (FedSEP) supporting documents in the digital format required by the Commission, referencing the compliance docket number under which compliance was being monitored. Once all compliance is complete, the Agency shall submit via FedSEP a final compliance report in the digital format required by the Commission. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.403(g). The Agency’s final report must contain supporting documentation when previously not uploaded, and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant and his/her representative. If the Agency does not comply with the Commission’s order, the Complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission’s order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled “Right to File a Civil Action.” 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.409. COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610) This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission’s decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815) If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may 2019003626 4 request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant’s Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits). FOR THE COMMISSION: ______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden’s signature Carlton M. Hadden, Director Office of Federal Operations June 7, 2019 Date Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation