Elizabeth J. Davis, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southwest Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 12, 2005
05a50693 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 12, 2005)

05a50693

04-12-2005

Elizabeth J. Davis, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southwest Area), Agency.


Elizabeth J. Davis v. United States Postal Service

05A50693

April 12, 2005

.

Elizabeth J. Davis,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Southwest Area),

Agency.

Request No. 05A50693

Appeal No. 01A45656

Agency No. 1G-721-0058-03

DENIAL

Elizabeth J. Davis (complainant) timely requested reconsideration of

the decision in Elizabeth J. Davis v. United States Postal Service, EEOC

Appeal No. 01A45656 (February 15, 2005). EEOC Regulations provide that

the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any

previous Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that:

(1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a

substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the

agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

In her request for reconsideration, complainant contends that the

Commission erred when it only ordered the agency to implement the

terms of the settlement agreement as a remedy for our breach finding.

Complainant requests that the Commission also sanction the agency and

award her compensatory damages. We note that to remedy a finding of

breach, the Commission may order reinstatement of the underlying complaint

or enforcement of the agreement's terms. See 29 C.F.R. 1614.504(c).

In this matter, complainant is not entitled to any relief apart from

our Order requiring enforcement of the settlement agreement. See Allen

v. Department of the Interior, EEOC Request No. 05970352 (August 11,

1999) (citing Kessler v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request

No. 05970446 (February 26, 1999) and Martin v. Department of Defense,

EEOC Request No. 05940745 (August 24, 1995) (finding compensatory damages

unavailable for findings of settlement breach).

Therefore, after reconsidering the previous decision and the entire

record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria

of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to

deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01A45656 remains the

Commission's final decision. There is no further right of administrative

appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency shall, within 30 calendar days of the date this decision

becomes final, specifically enforce the settlement agreement by taking

the following actions:

The Manager of Distribution Operations (MD), Tour III, at the Processing

and Distribution Center, Little Rock, Arkansas shall conduct an

exhaustive investigation of the incident at issue. The MDO shall make

written requests to all of complainant's named witnesses to provide a

written or verbal statement concerning the incident. If the witnesses

wish to decline making such a statement, they must state their refusal

in writing.

Within 30 calendar days fo the conclusion of the investigation, the

MDO shall submit to the Compliance Officer, as referenced herein, the

investigative file, including all efforts made to contact the witnesses

and their responses.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

_April 12, 2005_________________

Date